Open Stack

Thanks!

On Tue Nov 25 2014 at 3:15:49 AM Yves-Gwenaël Bourhis <
yves-gwenael.bourhis at cloudwatt.com> wrote:

>
>
> Le 24/11/2014 04:20, Richard Jones a écrit :
> > Thanks everyone, I've closed the poll. I'm sorry to say that there's no
> > combination of two timeslots which allows everyone to attend a meeting.
> > Of the 25 respondents, the best we can do is cater for 24 of you.
> >
> > Optimising for the maximum number of attendees, the potential meeting
> > times are 2000 UTC Tuesday and 1000 UTC on one of Monday, Wednesday or
> > Friday. In all three cases the only person who has indicated they cannot
> > attend is Lifeless.
> >
> > Unfortunately, David has indicated that he can't be present at the
> > Tuesday 2000 UTC slot. Optimising for him as a required attendee for
> > both meetings means we lose an additional attendee, and gives us the
> > Wednesday 2000 UTC slot and a few options:
> >
> > - Monday, Wednesday and Thursday at 1200 UTC (Lifeless and ygbo miss)
>
> 1200 UTC is perfect for me.
> The doodle was proposing 1200 UTC to 1400 UTC and in the 2 hours
> bandwidth I can not be sure to be there. but if it's 1200 "on the spot"
> I can for sure :-)
> Since I couldn't precise this on the doodle I didn't select this slot. A
> one hour bandwidth would have allowed more precision but I understand
> you concern that the doodle would have been to long to scroll.
>
> --
> Yves-Gwenaël Bourhis
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141125/764d94ac/attachment.html>