Open Stack

On Nov 24, 2014, at 13:06, Jay Pipes <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:

> That said, I don't think it's wise to make oslo-versionedobjects be a totally new thing. I think we should use nova.objects as the base of a new oslo-versionedobjects library, and we should evolve oslo-versionedobjects slowly over time, eventually allowing for nova, ironic, and whomever else is currently using nova/objects, to align with an Oslo library vision for this.
> 
> So, in short, I also think a) is the appropriate path to take.

+1 I'd like to see oslo-versionedobjects start out with nova.objects as the implementation, with the ability to add support for protobuf later.

melanie (melwitt)




-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 496 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141124/03fb9245/attachment.pgp>