Open Stack

Thank you all for the reply's to this thread. I have now set all of the
listed spec's to an abandoned state, Please note that any review can be
recovered quickly but clicking the "Restore Change" button. If one of the
listed spec's is restored please be sure to re-target to the Kilo cycle.

Thank you,
Chris Krelle
Nobodycam

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 3:19 AM, Imre Farkas <ifarkas at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 11/19/2014 12:07 PM, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
>
>> On 11/18/2014 06:13 PM, Chris K wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> In an effort to keep the Ironic specs review queue as up to date as
>>> possible, I have identified several specs that were proposed in the Juno
>>> cycle and have not been updated to reflect the changes to the current
>>> Kilo cycle.
>>>
>>> I would like to set a deadline to either update them to reflect the Kilo
>>> cycle or abandon them if they are no longer relevant.
>>> If there are no objections I will abandon any specs on the list below
>>> that have not been updated to reflect the Kilo cycle after the end of
>>> the next Ironic meeting (Nov. 24th 2014).
>>>
>>> Below is the list of specs I have identified that would be affected:
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/107344 - *Generic Hardware Discovery
>>> Bits*
>>>
>> Killed it with fire :D
>>
>>  https://review.openstack.org/#/c/102557 - *Driver for NetApp storage
>>> arrays*
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/108324 - *DRAC hardware discovery*
>>>
>> Imre, are you going to work on it?
>>
>
> I think it's replaced by Lucas' proposal: https://review.openstack.org/#
> /c/125920
> I will discuss it with him and abandon one of them.
>
> Imre
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141124/f96459af/attachment.html>