Open Stack

Hi,

We're running Juno since a few weeks now, is it now possible to go dual
stack with l3-routers or are there some pieces missing and should I wait
for Kilo?

-Harm

On 08/19/2014 07:08 PM, Dane Leblanc (leblancd) wrote:
>
> Hi Harm:
>
>  
>
> Unfortunately I haven’t had time to complete the changes yet. Even
> if/when these changes are completed, it’s unlikely that this blueprint
> will get approved for Juno, but I’ll see what I can do.
>
>  
>
> Thanks,
>
> Dane
>
>  
>
>  
>
> *From:*Harm Weites [mailto:harm at weites.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, August 19, 2014 12:53 PM
> *To:* openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack
>
>  
>
> Thiago,
>
> My old setup was dual-stacked, simply using a flat linuxbridge. It's
> just that I now realy would like to separate multiple tenants using L3
> routers, which should be easy (dual stacked) to achieve once Dane's
> work is completed.
>
> Did you find the time to commit those required changes for that yet Dane?
>
> Regards,
> Harm
>
> op 16-08-14 23:33, Martinx - ジェームズ schreef:
>
>     Guys,
>
>      
>
>     Just for the record, I'm using IceHouse in a Dual-Stacked
>     environment (with security groups working) but, Instance's IPv6
>     address are static (no upstream SLAAC, arrived in Juno-2, I think)
>     and the topology is `VLAN Provider Networks`, no Neutron L3
>     Router. Where each VLAN have v4/v6 addrs, same upstream router
>     (also dual-stacked - still no radvd enabled).
>
>      
>
>     Looking forward to start testing L3 + IPv6 in K...
>
>      
>
>     Best,
>
>     Thiago
>
>      
>
>     On 16 August 2014 16:21, Harm Weites <harm at weites.com
>     <mailto:harm at weites.com>> wrote:
>
>     Hi Dane,
>
>     Thanks, that looks promising. Once support for multiple v6
>     addresses on
>     gateway ports is added I'll be happy to give this a go. Should it work
>     just fine with an otherwise Icehouse based deployment?
>
>     Regards,
>     Harm
>
>     op 16-08-14 20:31, Dane Leblanc (leblancd) schreef:
>
>     > Hi Harm:
>     >
>     > Can you take a look at the following, which should address this:
>     >   
>      https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/multiple-ipv6-prefixes
>     >
>     > There are some diffs out for review for this blueprint:
>     >    https://review.openstack.org/#/c/113339/
>     > but the change to support 1 V4 + multiple V6 addresses on a
>     gateway port hasn't been added yet. I should be adding this soon.
>     >
>     > There was a request for a Juno feature freeze exception for this
>     blueprint, but there's been no response, so this may not get
>     approved until K release.
>     >
>     > -Dane
>     >
>     > -----Original Message-----
>     > From: Harm Weites [mailto:harm at weites.com <mailto:harm at weites.com>]
>     > Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 2:22 PM
>     > To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     > Subject: [openstack-dev] Status of Neutron IPv6 dual stack
>     >
>     > Hi,
>     >
>     > Given the work on [1] has been abandoned, I'm wondering what the
>     current status of going dual stack is. Of course, given Neutron
>     got something like that on it's roadmap.
>     >
>     > The initial BP [2] aimed for Havana and Icehouse, and I'm
>     unaware of something similar to achieve a dual stack network. What
>     are the options, if any? To my knowledge it all comes down to
>     supporting multiple exterior interfaces (networks) on a l3-agent,
>     which is currently limited to just 1: either IP4 or IP6.
>     >
>     > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/77471/
>     > [2]
>     >
>     https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/allow-multiple-subnets-on-gateway-port
>     >
>     > Regards,
>     > Harm
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>     > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>     >
>     > _______________________________________________
>     > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>     > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     OpenStack-dev mailing list
>     OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>     <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>      
>
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>
>     OpenStack-dev mailing list
>
>     OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>
>     http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>  
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141121/cd075899/attachment.html>