Open Stack

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 10:30:59AM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui <
> sahid.ferdjaoui at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 02:00:11PM -0800, Joe Gordon wrote:
> > > On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 9:49 AM, Sahid Orentino Ferdjaoui <
> > > sahid.ferdjaoui at redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > This is something we can call nitpiking or low priority.
> > > >
> > >
> > > This all seems like nitpicking for very little value. I think there are
> > > better things we can be focusing on instead of thinking of new ways to
> > nit
> > > pick. So I am -1 on all of these.
> >
> > Yes as written this is low priority but something necessary for a
> > project like Nova it is.
> >
> >
> Why do you think this is necessary?
> 
> 
> > Considered that I feel sad to take your time. Can I suggest you to
> > take no notice of this and let's others developers working on Nova too
> > do this job ?
> >
> >
> As the maintainer of openstack-dev/hacking and as a nova core, I don't
> think this is worth doing at all. Nova already has enough on its plate and
> doesn't need extra code to review.
> 

I tend to agree, also hacking rules are there to reduce the mental load of
reviewers so that they have less to worry about doing a review. Honestly, none
of these proposals seem like anything a reviewer should ever worry about in the
first place, let alone a reason to -1 a patch. (either automatically with a rule
or manually)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141121/645d8aa5/attachment.pgp>