Open Stack

On 18/11/14 18:46 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>Flavio Percoco wrote:
>> On 18/11/14 11:42 +0100, Thierry Carrez wrote:
>>>> With storyboard.openstack.org <http://storyboard.openstack.org> looming
>>>> on the horizon, should such an effort be put on the back burner for now?
>>>
>>> I don't expect integrated projects to be able to switch to storyboard
>>> for bug tracking just yet. Our current goal is to have it ready for
>>> infrastructure dogfooding now (actually, yesterday), ready for feature
>>> tracking (and bugs tracking replacement for willing non-integrated
>>> guinea pigs) in 6 months, and ready for everyone in 12 months.
>>
>> Is it in a good enough state that would a low smaller projects - zaqar
>> - to jump in and help testing the storyboard? I'm happy to give it a
>> try.
>
>The trick is that it's missing some features that would make it a pain,
>even for an incubated project (think: no private security bugs). Also
>we'd like to switch all integrated projects at the same time, so that
>release management doesn't have to play with two tools in parallel.
>
>Also, nothing in storyboard actually makes triaging less painful :)

/me sadpanda

-- 
@flaper87
Flavio Percoco
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141119/51e9ba95/attachment.pgp>