Open Stack

+1 for Option #2

On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 5:56 PM, Lucas Alvares Gomes <lucasagomes at gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:00 AM, Devananda van der Veen
> <devananda.vdv at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > As discussed in Paris and at today's IRC meeting [1] we are going to be
> > alternating the time of the weekly IRC meetings to accommodate our
> > contributors in EMEA better. No time will be perfect for everyone, but
> as it
> > stands, we rarely (if ever) see our Indian, Chinese, and Japanese
> > contributors -- and it's quite hard for any of the AU / NZ folks to
> attend.
> >
> > I'm proposing two sets of times below. Please respond with a "-1" vote
> to an
> > option if that option would cause you to miss ALL meetings, or a "+1"
> vote
> > if you can magically attend ALL the meetings. If you can attend, without
> > significant disruption, at least one of the time slots in a proposal,
> please
> > do not vote either for or against it. This way we can identify a proposal
> > which allows everyone to attend at a minimum 50% of the meetings, and
> > preferentially weight towards one that allows more contributors to attend
> > two meetings.
> >
> > This link shows the local times in some major coutries / timezones around
> > the world (and you can customize it to add your own).
> >
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20141125&p1=224&p2=179&p3=78&p4=367&p5=44&p6=33&p7=248&p8=5
> >
> > For reference, the current meeting time is 1900 UTC.
> >
> > Option #1: alternate between Monday 1900 UTC && Tuesday 0900 UTC.  I like
> > this because 1900 UTC spans all of US and western EU, while 0900
> combines EU
> > and EMEA. Folks in western EU are "in the middle" and can attend all
> > meetings.
> >
> >
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2014&month=11&day=24&hour=19&min=0&sec=0&p1=224&p2=179&p3=78&p4=367&p5=44&p6=33&p7=248&p8=5
> >
> >
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2014&month=11&day=25&hour=9&min=0&sec=0&p1=224&p2=179&p3=78&p4=367&p5=44&p6=33&p7=248&p8=5
>
> +1
>
> >
> >
> > Option #2: alternate between Monday 1700 UTC && Tuesday 0500 UTC. I like
> > this because it shifts the current slot two hours earlier, making it
> easier
> > for eastern EU to attend without excluding the western US, and while 0500
> > UTC is not so late that US west coast contributors can't attend (it's 9PM
> > for us), it is harder for western EU folks to attend. There's really no
> one
> > in the middle here, but there is at least a chance for US west coast and
> > EMEA to overlap, which we don't have at any other time.
> >
> >
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2014&month=11&day=24&hour=17&min=0&sec=0&p1=224&p2=179&p3=78&p4=367&p5=44&p6=33&p7=248&p8=5
> >
> >
> > I'll collate all the responses to this thread during the week, ahead of
> next
> > week's regularly-scheduled meeting.
> >
> > -Devananda
> >
> > [1]
> >
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2014/ironic.2014-11-17-19.00.log.html
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>



-- 
*Intel SSG/STO/BDT*
880 Zixing Road, Zizhu Science Park, Minhang District, 200241, Shanghai,
China
+862161166500
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141118/ec95bf40/attachment.html>