Open Stack

Hi devananda,

I would be comfortable with both the timings, though I like the second
option better. I am from India, so current timing is a little
inconvenient for us! 

On 11/18/2014 06:30 AM, Devananda van der Veen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As discussed in Paris and at today's IRC meeting [1] we are going to be
> alternating the time of the weekly IRC meetings to accommodate our
> contributors in EMEA better. No time will be perfect for everyone, but as
> it stands, we rarely (if ever) see our Indian, Chinese, and Japanese
> contributors -- and it's quite hard for any of the AU / NZ folks to attend.
>
> I'm proposing two sets of times below. Please respond with a "-1" vote to
> an option if that option would cause you to miss ALL meetings, or a "+1"
> vote if you can magically attend ALL the meetings. If you can attend,
> without significant disruption, at least one of the time slots in a
> proposal, please do not vote either for or against it. This way we can
> identify a proposal which allows everyone to attend at a minimum 50% of the
> meetings, and preferentially weight towards one that allows more
> contributors to attend two meetings.
>
> This link shows the local times in some major coutries / timezones around
> the world (and you can customize it to add your own).
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingtime.html?iso=20141125&p1=224&p2=179&p3=78&p4=367&p5=44&p6=33&p7=248&p8=5
>
> For reference, the current meeting time is 1900 UTC.
>
> Option #1: alternate between Monday 1900 UTC && Tuesday 0900 UTC.  I like
> this because 1900 UTC spans all of US and western EU, while 0900 combines
> EU and EMEA. Folks in western EU are "in the middle" and can attend all
> meetings.
>
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2014&month=11&day=24&hour=19&min=0&sec=0&p1=224&p2=179&p3=78&p4=367&p5=44&p6=33&p7=248&p8=5
>
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2014&month=11&day=25&hour=9&min=0&sec=0&p1=224&p2=179&p3=78&p4=367&p5=44&p6=33&p7=248&p8=5
>
>
> Option #2: alternate between Monday 1700 UTC && Tuesday 0500 UTC. I like
> this because it shifts the current slot two hours earlier, making it easier
> for eastern EU to attend without excluding the western US, and while 0500
> UTC is not so late that US west coast contributors can't attend (it's 9PM
> for us), it is harder for western EU folks to attend. There's really no one
> in the middle here, but there is at least a chance for US west coast and
> EMEA to overlap, which we don't have at any other time.
>
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/meetingdetails.html?year=2014&month=11&day=24&hour=17&min=0&sec=0&p1=224&p2=179&p3=78&p4=367&p5=44&p6=33&p7=248&p8=5
>
>
> I'll collate all the responses to this thread during the week, ahead of
> next week's regularly-scheduled meeting.
>
> -Devananda
>
> [1]
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/ironic/2014/ironic.2014-11-17-19.00.log.html
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-- 
Peeyush Gupta
gpeeyush at linux.vnet.ibm.com

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141118/94ec7f83/attachment.html>