Open Stack

Hi Steve,
    For SR-IOV testing we have a CI job running on a multi node setup with
Cisco SR-IOV NIC doing API testing on Neutron patches. It is not reporting
results up to Neutron yet and currently is used for internal testing only.

We are working on the following:
1. Getting the full Tempest tests to pass on this testbed.
2. Writing new tempest tests specifically for SR-IOV
3. Running CI tests on Nova patches (in addition to Neutron patches)

I would be the point of contact for this CI testbed.

Thanks,
Sandhya

On 11/16/14 8:31 AM, "Irena Berezovsky" <irenab at mellanox.com> wrote:

>Hi Steve,
>Regarding SR-IOV testing, at Mellanox we have CI job running on bare
>metal node with Mellanox SR-IOV NIC.  This job is reporting on neutron
>patches. Currently API tests are executed.
>The contact person for SRIOV CI job is listed at driverlog:
>https://github.com/stackforge/driverlog/blob/master/etc/default_data.json#
>L1439
>
>The following items are in progress:
> - SR-IOV functional testing
> - Reporting CI job on nova patches
> - Multi-node setup
>It worth to mention that we   want to start the collaboration on SR-IOV
>testing effort as part of the pci pass-through subteam activity.
>Please join the weekly meeting if you want to collaborate or have some
>inputs: https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Passthrough
>
>BR,
>Irena
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Steve Gordon [mailto:sgordon at redhat.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 9:11 PM
>To: itai mendelsohn; Adrian Hoban; Russell Bryant; Ian Wells (iawells);
>Irena Berezovsky; baoli at cisco.com
>Cc: Nikola Đipanov; Russell Bryant; OpenStack Development Mailing List
>(not for usage questions)
>Subject: [Nova][Neutron][NFV][Third-party] CI for NUMA, SR-IOV, and other
>features that can't be tested on current infra.
>
>Hi all,
>
>We had some discussions last week - particularly in the Nova NFV design
>session [1] - on the subject of ensuring that telecommunications and
>NFV-related functionality has adequate continuous integration testing. In
>particular the focus here is on functionality that can't easily be tested
>on the public clouds that back the gate, including:
>
>- NUMA (vCPU pinning, vCPU layout, vRAM layout, huge pages, I/O device
>locality)
>- SR-IOV with Intel, Cisco, and Mellanox devices (possibly others)
>  
>In each case we need to confirm where we are at, and the plan going
>forward, with regards to having:
>
>1) Hardware to run the CI on.
>2) Tests that actively exercise the functionality (if not already in
>existence).
>3) Point person for each setup to maintain it and report into the
>third-party meeting [2].
>4) Getting the jobs operational and reporting [3][4][5][6].
>
>In the Nova session we discussed a goal of having the hardware by K-1
>(Dec 18) and having it reporting at least periodically by K-2 (Feb 5).
>I'm not sure if similar discussions occurred on the Neutron side of the
>design summit.
>
>SR-IOV
>======
>
>Adrian and Irena mentioned they were already in the process of getting up
>to speed with third party CI for their respective SR-IOV configurations.
>Robert are you attempting similar with regards to Cisco devices? What is
>the status of each of these efforts versus the four items I lifted above
>and what do you need assistance with?
>
>NUMA
>====
>
>We still need to identify some hardware to run third party CI for the
>NUMA-related work, and no doubt other things that will come up. It's
>expected that this will be an interim solution until OPNFV resources can
>be used (note cdub jokingly replied 1-2 years when asked for a "rough"
>estimate - I mention this because based on a later discussion some people
>took this as a serious estimate).
>
>Ian did you have any luck kicking this off? Russell and I are also
>endeavouring to see what we can do on our side w.r.t. this short term
>approach - in particular if you find hardware we still need to find an
>owner to actually setup and manage it as discussed.
>
>In theory to get started we need a physical multi-socket box and a
>virtual machine somewhere on the same network to handle job control etc.
>I believe the tests themselves can be run in VMs (just not those exposed
>by existing public clouds) assuming a recent Libvirt and an appropriately
>crafted Libvirt XML that ensures the VM gets a multi-socket topology etc.
>(we can assist with this).
>
>Thanks,
>
>Steve
>
>[1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/kilo-nova-nfv
>[2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/ThirdParty
>[3] http://ci.openstack.org/third_party.html
>[4] http://www.joinfu.com/2014/01/understanding-the-openstack-ci-system/
>[5] 
>http://www.joinfu.com/2014/02/setting-up-an-external-openstack-testing-sys
>tem/
>[6] 
>http://www.joinfu.com/2014/02/setting-up-an-openstack-external-testing-sys
>tem-part-2/
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev