Open Stack

On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 5:12 PM, Eric Windisch <eric at windisch.us> wrote:

>
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 8:43 AM, Denis Makogon <dmakogon at mirantis.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Good day, Stackers.
>>
>>
>> During Paris Design summit oslo.messaging session was raised good
>> question about maintaining ZeroMQ driver in upstream (see section “dropping
>> ZeroMQ support in oslo.messaging” at [1]) . As we all know, good
>> thoughts are comming always after. I’d like to propose several improvements
>> in process of maintaining and developing of ZeroMQ driver in upstream.
>>
>>
>>
> I'm glad to see the community looking to revive this driver. What I think
> could be valuable if there are enough developers is a sub-team as is done
> with Nova. That doesn't mean to splinter the community, but to provide a
> focal point for interested developers to interact.
>
>
Yes, that's what i've been trying to say, sub-group'ing doing mean
"completely new community". The reason why i've proposed it is a need to
maintain driver by those who's interested in it. As already said, there're
not so many of us who uses (or considering) zmq driver. So, eventually,
we're on the same boat - let's co-work on making it better than it is now.


> I agree with the idea that this should be tested via Tempest. It's easy
> enough to mask off the failing tests and enable more tests as either the
> driver itself improves, or support in consuming projects and/or
> oslo.messaging itself improves. I'd suggest that effort is better spent
> there than building new bespoke tests.
>
> Thanks and good luck! :)
>
> Regards,
> Eric Windisch
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
Best regards,
Denis M.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141117/462a6b80/attachment.html>