Zane Bitter wrote: > On 01/11/14 16:31, Eoghan Glynn wrote: >> 1. *make a minor concession to proportionality* - while keeping the >> focus on consensus, e.g. by adopting the proportional Condorcet >> variant. > > It would be interesting to see the analysis again, but in the past this > proved to not make much difference. For the record, I just ran the ballots in CIVS "proportional mode" and obtained the same set of winners: http://civs.cs.cornell.edu/cgi-bin/results.pl?id=E_88cae988dff29be6 Regards, -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)