ayoung at redhat.com
Wed Nov 12 02:14:37 UTC 2014
On 11/11/2014 05:47 PM, Ian Cordasco wrote:
> On 11/11/14, 16:35, "Adam Young" <ayoung at redhat.com> wrote:
>> Recent recurrence of the "Why ios everything on its own port" question
>> triggered my desire to take this pattern and put it to rest.
>> My suggestion, from a while ago, was to have a naming scheme that
>> deconflicts putting all of the services onto a single server, on port 443.
>> I've removed a lot of the cruft, but not added in entries for all the
>> new *aaS services.
>> Please add in anything that should be part of OpenStack. Let's make
>> this a reality, and remove the specific ports.
>> If you are worried about debugging, look into rpdb. It is a valuable
>> tool for debugging a mod_wsgi based application.
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> Is the reason subdomains aren’t being suggested because of the expense of
> *.hostname certificates?
No, more due to the preponderance of all-in-one install options for
smaller deployments. Having one hostname per service should work just
as well, this being the more restrictive approach.
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
More information about the OpenStack-dev