[openstack-dev] [all] config options not correctly deprecated
Daniel P. Berrange
berrange at redhat.com
Mon Nov 10 11:00:59 UTC 2014
On Mon, Nov 10, 2014 at 09:45:02AM +0000, Derek Higgins wrote:
> Tl;dr oslo.config wasn't logging warnings about deprecated config
> options, do we need to support them for another cycle?
AFAIK, there has not been any change in olso.config behaviour
in the Juno release, as compared to previous releases. The
oslo.config behaviour is that the generated sample config file
contain all the deprecation information.
The idea that olso.config issue log warnings is a decent RFE
to make the use of deprecated config settings more visible.
This is an enhancement though, not a bug.
> A set of patches to remove deprecated options in Nova was landed on
> Thursday, these were marked as deprecated during the juno dev cycle
> and got removed now that kilo has started.
Yes, this is our standard practice - at the start of each release
cycle, we delete anything that was marked as deprected in the
previous release cycle. ie we give downstream users/apps 1 release
cycle of grace to move to the new option names.
> Most of the deprecated config options are listed as deprecated in the
> documentation for nova.conf changes linked to from the Nova upgrade
> section in the Juno release notes (the deprecated cinder config
> options are not listed here along with the allowed_direct_url_schemes
> glance option).
The sample nova.conf generated by olso lists all the deprecations.
For example, for cinder options it shows what the old config option
# Options defined in nova.volume.cinder
# Info to match when looking for cinder in the service
# catalog. Format is: separated values of the form:
# <service_type>:<service_name>:<endpoint_type> (string value)
# Deprecated group/name - [DEFAULT]/cinder_catalog_info
Also note the deprecated name will not appear as an option in the
sample config file at all, other than in this deprecation comment.
> My main worry is that there were no warnings about these options being
> deprecated in nova's logs (as a result they were still being used in
> tripleo), once I noticed tripleo's CI jobs were failing and discovered
> the reason I submitted 4 reverts to put back the deprecated options in
> nova as I believe they should now be supported for another cycle
> (along with a fix to oslo.config to log warnings about their use). The 4
> patches have now been blocked as they go "against our deprecation policy".
> I believe the correct way to handle this is to support these options for
> another cycle so that other operators don't get hit when upgrading to
> kilo. While at that same time fix oslo.config to report the deprecated
> options in kilo.
> I have marked this mail with the [all] tag because there are other
> projects using the same "deprecated_name" (or "deprecated_group")
> parameter when adding config options, I think those projects also now
> need to support their deprecated options for another cycle.
AFAIK, there's nothing different about Juno vs previous release cycles,
so I don't see any reason to do anything different this time around.
No matter what we do there is always a possibility that downstream
apps / users will not notice and/or ignore the deprecation. We should
certainly look at how to make deprecation more obvious, but I don't
think we should change our policy just because an app missed the fact
that these were deprecated.
> I've also opened a bug for this against tripleo, nova and oslo.conf
> and for the moment in tripleo-ci I have pinned the version of nova we
> use to something from before the commits were merged while we get a
> chance to correctly use the new name for each of the options that were
> On a side node, When trying to look up the deprecation policy I wasn't
> able to find it so if anybody has a link handy can you point me at it.
I'm not aware of it being written down - it is just one of those
policies that is "herd" knowledge. At the start of each release
cycle we delete all deprecated bits from the previous release
cycle, whether they are config options, classes, methods, or any
other part of nova tree. We've been doing this for as long as I've
been involved in Nova.
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
More information about the OpenStack-dev