[openstack-dev] [Neutron][Spec freeze exception] Rootwrap daemon ode support
John Schwarz
jschwarz at redhat.com
Mon Nov 10 06:52:22 UTC 2014
+1. I think this is an important feature and I'd be happy to do reviews
when needed - hopefully this can get in by Kilo! :)
On 11/08/2014 12:24 PM, Armando M. wrote:
> Hi Miguel,
>
> Thanks for picking this up. Pull me in and I'd be happy to help!
>
> Cheers,
> Armando
>
> On 7 November 2014 10:05, Miguel Ángel Ajo <majopela at redhat.com
> <mailto:majopela at redhat.com>> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Yorik,
>
> I was talking with Mark Mcclain a minute ago here at the summit
> about this. And he told me that now at the start of the cycle looks
> like a good moment to merge the spec & the root wrap daemon bits, so
> we have a lot of headroom for testing during the next months.
>
> We need to upgrade the spec [1] to the new Kilo format.
>
> Do you have some time to do it?, I can allocate some time and do
> it right away.
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93889/
> --
> Miguel Ángel Ajo
> Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig>
>
> On Thursday, 24 de July de 2014 at 01:42, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com
>> <http://www.nitrodesk.com>)
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Yuriy Taraday [yorik.sar at gmail.com
>> <mailto:yorik.sar at gmail.com>]
>> Received: Thursday, 24 Jul 2014, 0:42
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
>> [openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> <mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>]
>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Spec freeze exception] Rootwrap
>> daemon mode support
>>
>>
>> Hello.
>>
>> I'd like to propose making a spec freeze exception for
>> rootwrap-daemon-mode spec [1].
>>
>> Its goal is to save agents' execution time by using daemon mode
>> for rootwrap and thus avoiding python interpreter startup time as
>> well as sudo overhead for each call. Preliminary benchmark shows
>> 10x+ speedup of the rootwrap interaction itself.
>>
>> This spec have a number of supporters from Neutron team (Carl and
>> Miguel gave it their +2 and +1) and have all code waiting for
>> review [2], [3], [4].
>> The only thing that has been blocking its progress is Mark's -2
>> left when oslo.rootwrap spec hasn't been merged yet. Now that's
>> not the case and code in oslo.rootwrap is steadily getting
>> approved [5].
>>
>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/93889
>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/82787
>> [3] https://review.openstack.org/84667
>> [4] https://review.openstack.org/107386
>> [5] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/oslo.rootwrap+topic:bp/rootwrap-daemon-mode,n,z
>>
>> --
>>
>> Kind regards, Yuriy.
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list