Open Stack

Hi,



Why not use already defined multi-segements (or multi-provider-network) API interface, and hide the L2GW explicit manipulation?



Best Regards



Chaoyi Huang ( joehuang )

________________________________
From: Sukhdev Kapur [sukhdevkapur at gmail.com]
Sent: 06 November 2014 19:27
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] L2 Gateway discussion

resending with with the correct subject

On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 12:22 PM, Sukhdev Kapur <sukhdevkapur at gmail.com<mailto:sukhdevkapur at gmail.com>> wrote:
Folks,

After Maruti's lighting talk on L2 Gateway, bunch of people/vendors expressed interest in coming up with an API for this service. The goal is to come up with a basic set of API which can be implemented in Kilo time frame and build upon it over time in the future.
Armando, Akihiro, and others present in this small discussion decided to get together tomorrow morning (Friday) in the Pods area (outside Degas Room) at 9:30am.

If anybody has any interest in this discussion or can add value to this discussion, this will be a great opportunity to stop by.

Thanks
Sukhdev


_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141107/6de7a868/attachment.html>