Open Stack

It hasn't been started it yet. AFAIR Nova people wanted to see it working
in Neutron first (and I asked them too late in Juno cycle), so I tried to
push it to Neutron only first.
I don't know if anyone is interested in implementing this for Nova but I'll
ask around.

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Miguel Ángel Ajo <majopela at redhat.com>
wrote:

>  Yuriy, what’s the status of the rootwrap-daemon implementation on the
> nova side?, was it merged?, otherwise do you think there could be anyone
> interested in picking it up?
>
> Best regards,
>
> --
> Miguel Ángel Ajo
> Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig>
>
> On Friday, 7 de November de 2014 at 11:52, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote:
>
>  Ohh, sad to hear that Yuriy, you were doing an awesome work. I will take
> some time to re-review the final state of the code and specs, and move it
> forward. Thank you very much for your contribution.
>
> --
> Miguel Ángel Ajo
> Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig>
>
> On Friday, 7 de November de 2014 at 11:44, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
>
> Hello, Miguel.
>
> I switched departments recently and unfortunately don't have much free
> time for community work. Feel free to pick up my change requests and push
> them if you have time. I'll try to keep track of these changes and give
> some feedback on them on occasion, but don't wait on me.
> Thank you for keeping this feature in mind. I'd be glad to see it finally
> used in Neutron (and any other project).
>
> --
>
> Kind regards, Yuriy.
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Miguel Ángel Ajo <majopela at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Yorik,
>
>    I was talking with Mark Mcclain a minute ago here at the summit about
> this. And he told me that now at the start of the cycle looks like a good
> moment to merge the spec & the root wrap daemon bits, so we have a lot of
> headroom for testing during the next months.
>
>    We need to upgrade the spec [1] to the new Kilo format.
>
>    Do you have some time to do it?, I can allocate some time and do it
> right away.
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93889/
> --
> Miguel Ángel Ajo
> Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig>
>
> On Thursday, 24 de July de 2014 at 01:42, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yuriy Taraday [yorik.sar at gmail.com]
> Received: Thursday, 24 Jul 2014, 0:42
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List [openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org]
>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Spec freeze exception] Rootwrap daemon
>    mode support
>
>
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to propose making a spec freeze exception for
> rootwrap-daemon-mode spec [1].
>
> Its goal is to save agents' execution time by using daemon mode for
> rootwrap and thus avoiding python interpreter startup time as well as sudo
> overhead for each call. Preliminary benchmark shows 10x+ speedup of the
> rootwrap interaction itself.
>
> This spec have a number of supporters from Neutron team (Carl and Miguel
> gave it their +2 and +1) and have all code waiting for review [2], [3], [4].
> The only thing that has been blocking its progress is Mark's -2 left when
> oslo.rootwrap spec hasn't been merged yet. Now that's not the case and code
> in oslo.rootwrap is steadily getting approved [5].
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/93889
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/82787
> [3] https://review.openstack.org/84667
> [4] https://review.openstack.org/107386
> [5]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/oslo.rootwrap+topic:bp/rootwrap-daemon-mode,n,z
>
>
>
>  _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>


-- 

Kind regards, Yuriy.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141107/4d4aff34/attachment.html>