Open Stack

Yuriy, what’s the status of the rootwrap-daemon implementation on the nova side?, was it merged?, otherwise do you think there could be anyone interested in picking it up?  

Best regards,  

--  
Miguel Ángel Ajo
Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)


On Friday, 7 de November de 2014 at 11:52, Miguel Ángel Ajo wrote:

> Ohh, sad to hear that Yuriy, you were doing an awesome work. I will take some time to re-review the final state of the code and specs, and move it forward. Thank you very much for your contribution.  
>  
> --  
> Miguel Ángel Ajo
> Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
>  
>  
> On Friday, 7 de November de 2014 at 11:44, Yuriy Taraday wrote:
>  
> > Hello, Miguel.
> >  
> > I switched departments recently and unfortunately don't have much free time for community work. Feel free to pick up my change requests and push them if you have time. I'll try to keep track of these changes and give some feedback on them on occasion, but don't wait on me.
> > Thank you for keeping this feature in mind. I'd be glad to see it finally used in Neutron (and any other project).
> >  
> > --  
> >  
> > Kind regards, Yuriy.
> >  
> > On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Miguel Ángel Ajo <majopela at redhat.com (mailto:majopela at redhat.com)> wrote:
> > >  
> > > Hi Yorik,
> > >  
> > >    I was talking with Mark Mcclain a minute ago here at the summit about this. And he told me that now at the start of the cycle looks like a good moment to merge the spec & the root wrap daemon bits, so we have a lot of headroom for testing during the next months.
> > >  
> > >    We need to upgrade the spec [1] to the new Kilo format.
> > >  
> > >    Do you have some time to do it?, I can allocate some time and do it right away.
> > >  
> > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93889/
> > > --  
> > > Miguel Ángel Ajo
> > > Sent with Sparrow (http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig)
> > >  
> > >  
> > > On Thursday, 24 de July de 2014 at 01:42, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
> > >  
> > > > +1  
> > > >  
> > > > Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com (http://www.nitrodesk.com))  
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > > -----Original Message-----  
> > > > From: Yuriy Taraday [yorik.sar at gmail.com (mailto:yorik.sar at gmail.com)]  
> > > > Received: Thursday, 24 Jul 2014, 0:42  
> > > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List [openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org (mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org)]  
> > > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Spec freeze exception] Rootwrap daemon     mode support  
> > > >  
> > > >  
> > > > Hello.
> > > >  
> > > > I'd like to propose making a spec freeze exception for rootwrap-daemon-mode spec [1].
> > > >  
> > > > Its goal is to save agents' execution time by using daemon mode for rootwrap and thus avoiding python interpreter startup time as well as sudo overhead for each call. Preliminary benchmark shows 10x+ speedup of the rootwrap interaction itself.  
> > > >  
> > > > This spec have a number of supporters from Neutron team (Carl and Miguel gave it their +2 and +1) and have all code waiting for review [2], [3], [4].
> > > > The only thing that has been blocking its progress is Mark's -2 left when oslo.rootwrap spec hasn't been merged yet. Now that's not the case and code in oslo.rootwrap is steadily getting approved [5].
> > > >  
> > > > [1] https://review.openstack.org/93889
> > > > [2] https://review.openstack.org/82787
> > > > [3] https://review.openstack.org/84667
> > > > [4] https://review.openstack.org/107386
> > > > [5] https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/oslo.rootwrap+topic:bp/rootwrap-daemon-mode,n,z
> >  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org (mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org)
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>  
>  


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141107/e432729e/attachment.html>