Open Stack

Hello, Miguel.

I switched departments recently and unfortunately don't have much free time
for community work. Feel free to pick up my change requests and push them
if you have time. I'll try to keep track of these changes and give some
feedback on them on occasion, but don't wait on me.
Thank you for keeping this feature in mind. I'd be glad to see it finally
used in Neutron (and any other project).

-- 

Kind regards, Yuriy.

On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Miguel Ángel Ajo <majopela at redhat.com>
wrote:

>
> Hi Yorik,
>
>    I was talking with Mark Mcclain a minute ago here at the summit about
> this. And he told me that now at the start of the cycle looks like a good
> moment to merge the spec & the root wrap daemon bits, so we have a lot of
> headroom for testing during the next months.
>
>    We need to upgrade the spec [1] to the new Kilo format.
>
>    Do you have some time to do it?, I can allocate some time and do it
> right away.
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/93889/
> --
> Miguel Ángel Ajo
> Sent with Sparrow <http://www.sparrowmailapp.com/?sig>
>
> On Thursday, 24 de July de 2014 at 01:42, Miguel Angel Ajo Pelayo wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Sent from my Android phone using TouchDown (www.nitrodesk.com)
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Yuriy Taraday [yorik.sar at gmail.com]
> Received: Thursday, 24 Jul 2014, 0:42
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List [openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org]
>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][Spec freeze exception] Rootwrap daemon
>    mode support
>
>
> Hello.
>
> I'd like to propose making a spec freeze exception for
> rootwrap-daemon-mode spec [1].
>
> Its goal is to save agents' execution time by using daemon mode for
> rootwrap and thus avoiding python interpreter startup time as well as sudo
> overhead for each call. Preliminary benchmark shows 10x+ speedup of the
> rootwrap interaction itself.
>
> This spec have a number of supporters from Neutron team (Carl and Miguel
> gave it their +2 and +1) and have all code waiting for review [2], [3], [4].
> The only thing that has been blocking its progress is Mark's -2 left when
> oslo.rootwrap spec hasn't been merged yet. Now that's not the case and code
> in oslo.rootwrap is steadily getting approved [5].
>
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/93889
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/82787
> [3] https://review.openstack.org/84667
> [4] https://review.openstack.org/107386
> [5]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/project:openstack/oslo.rootwrap+topic:bp/rootwrap-daemon-mode,n,z
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141107/426e7df3/attachment.html>