Open Stack

+1

IMHO, it is enough for [1][3] to fix by issuing a bug report.

Thanks
Itsuro Oda

On Thu, 6 Nov 2014 17:20:57 +0100
ZZelle <zzelle at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> 
> iiuc,
> 
> It seems [1][3] share exactly the same objective and implementation
> intention:
>  - define an common abstract dhcp scheduler class
>  - define a dhcp LeastNetworkScheduler
> 
> [2] proposes to
> - define a dhcp LeastVmScheduler (networks are scheduled on the dhcp agent
> supporting the least vms (=>ports?))
> 
> 
> So i am not sure we need an umbrella spec as [1][3] can be merged in [1]
> (the older wins?)
> and [2] can become a daughter spec or can be merged with previous spec?
> 
> 
> Cedric,
> ZZelle at IRC
> 
> 
> [1] https://review.openstack.org/104587
> [2] https://review.openstack.org/111210
> [3] https://review.openstack.org/130912
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Narasimhan, Vivekanandan <
> vivekanandan.narasimhan at hp.com> wrote:
> 
> >  Hi Neutron Stackers,
> >
> >
> >
> > There is an interest among vendors to bring Least Networks scheduling for
> > DHCP into Openstack Neutron.
> >
> >
> >
> > Currently there are the following blueprints lying there, all of them
> > trying to address this issue:
> >
> > https://review.openstack.org/111210
> >
> > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130912/
> >
> > https://review.openstack.org/104587
> >
> >
> >
> > We are trying  to pull together all these BPs as one Umbrella BP, on which
> > we
> >
> > can pour volunteers from every side, to clear out this BP itself as
> > initial step.
> >
> >
> >
> > So we would like to collaborate, to plan BP approval for these.
> >
> >
> >
> > Please respond if you are interested.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> >
> > Vivek
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >

-- 
Itsuro ODA <oda at valinux.co.jp>