Open Stack

Hi,


iiuc,

It seems [1][3] share exactly the same objective and implementation
intention:
 - define an common abstract dhcp scheduler class
 - define a dhcp LeastNetworkScheduler

[2] proposes to
- define a dhcp LeastVmScheduler (networks are scheduled on the dhcp agent
supporting the least vms (=>ports?))


So i am not sure we need an umbrella spec as [1][3] can be merged in [1]
(the older wins?)
and [2] can become a daughter spec or can be merged with previous spec?


Cedric,
ZZelle at IRC


[1] https://review.openstack.org/104587
[2] https://review.openstack.org/111210
[3] https://review.openstack.org/130912




On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 4:39 PM, Narasimhan, Vivekanandan <
vivekanandan.narasimhan at hp.com> wrote:

>  Hi Neutron Stackers,
>
>
>
> There is an interest among vendors to bring Least Networks scheduling for
> DHCP into Openstack Neutron.
>
>
>
> Currently there are the following blueprints lying there, all of them
> trying to address this issue:
>
> https://review.openstack.org/111210
>
> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/130912/
>
> https://review.openstack.org/104587
>
>
>
> We are trying  to pull together all these BPs as one Umbrella BP, on which
> we
>
> can pour volunteers from every side, to clear out this BP itself as
> initial step.
>
>
>
> So we would like to collaborate, to plan BP approval for these.
>
>
>
> Please respond if you are interested.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
> Vivek
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141106/da4644e7/attachment.html>