Open Stack

I am +1 for using cobbler as power management before we merge Ironic-based
stuff. It is essential part also for our HA and stop
provisioning/deployment mechanism.

On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Dmitriy Shulyak <dshulyak at mirantis.com>
wrote:

> Not long time ago we discussed necessity of power management feature in
> Fuel.
>
> What is your opinion on power management support in Cobbler, i took a look
> at documentation [1] and templates [2] that  we have right now.
> And it actually looks like we can make use of it.
>
> The only issue is that power address that cobbler system is configured
> with is wrong.
> Because provisioning serializer uses one reported by boostrap, but it can
> be easily fixed.
>
> Ofcourse another question is separate network for power management, but we
> can leave with
> admin for now.
>
> Please share your opinions on this matter. Thanks
>
> [1] http://www.cobblerd.org/manuals/2.6.0/4/5_-_Power_Management.html
> [2] http://paste.openstack.org/show/129063/
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>


-- 
Yours Faithfully,
Vladimir Kuklin,
Fuel Library Tech Lead,
Mirantis, Inc.
+7 (495) 640-49-04
+7 (926) 702-39-68
Skype kuklinvv
45bk3, Vorontsovskaya Str.
Moscow, Russia,
www.mirantis.com <http://www.mirantis.ru/>
www.mirantis.ru
vkuklin at mirantis.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141105/08ad540d/attachment.html>