On Sunday, November 2, 2014, John Dennis <jdennis at redhat.com> wrote: > It was hoped we could simply borrow the Keystone mapping > implementation but it was found to be too limiting and not sufficiently > expressive. We could not find another alternative so we designed a new > mapper which is described in this PDF. > In what way was it too limited? Did you consider extending the existing grammar and extending the existing mapping engine? -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20141102/289b2686/attachment.html>