Hi Sumit, Review commitment sound like a good idea. Is this aiming core reviewers only? What number of cores / non cores are you ideally trying to reach? Thanks, Ivar. On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 7:21 PM, Sumit Naiksatam <sumitnaiksatam at gmail.com> wrote: > During the Neutron Advanced Services' meeting this week [1], we > discussed a plan to make the review process more predictable and > accountable (as an experiment within this sub-team). > > We are soliciting reviewers who will commit to reviewing at least the > prioritized blueprints [2] on a weekly basis and help make progress. > If you feel comfortable making this commitment, please add your name > to the top of this wiki page [2]. This will help the task owners to > reach out to you and reconcile issues faster. It will also aid the > core reviewers in making a judgement based on the feedback from of > this reviewer team. > > Thanks, > ~Sumit. > > [1] > http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/networking_advanced_services/2014/networking_advanced_services.2014-05-28-17.31.log.html > > [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/AdvancedServices/JunoPlan > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- Ivar. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140530/9da3381c/attachment.html>