Open Stack

On 05/27/2014 02:42 PM, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com wrote:
> 
> Hi-
> 
> Sure Anita. I have been attending meeting for ML2 at #openstack-meeting-alt.
> 
> Will also, attend the below mentioned meetings ..
> 
> Thanking you.
> 
> -
> Trinaths
Great. Have you ever considered spending time in the channels I
mentioned (they aren't meetings) and asking questions in the channel?
Some people find that is a very efficient way of working.

Anita.
> ________________________________________
> From: Anita Kuno <anteaya at anteaya.info>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 10:45 PM
> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] BPs for Juno-1
> 
> On 05/27/2014 01:03 PM, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com wrote:
>> Hi-
>>
>>
>> Thanks a lot Salvatore.
>>
>>
>> I'm looking into that issue. I'm troubleshooting the same.
>>
>>
>> Will update this mail chain when its accessible for review.
>>
>>
>> Thanks a lot for the review Salvatore.
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Trinath
> Have you considered starting an irc client, navigating to freenode and
> joining the #openstack-dev and #openstack-neutron channels? It would
> increase the rate at which you learn how to amend your code to get it
> merged. It also would help as you troubleshoot your CI system.
> 
> Give it some thought,
> Anita.
>>
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Salvatore Orlando <sorlando at nicira.com>
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 10:29 PM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] BPs for Juno-1
>>
>> Too late.
>>
>> I just approved the specification.
>> I don't think there is any need for reverting the blueprint and just updating the topic in the patch.
>>
>> Please have a look at Freescale CI - logs are not accessible at the moment.
>>
>> Salvatore
>>
>>
>> On 27 May 2014 18:51, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com<mailto:trinath.somanchi at freescale.com> <trinath.somanchi at freescale.com<mailto:trinath.somanchi at freescale.com>> wrote:
>> Hi-
>>
>> Sure!. Will change the topic and update you.
>>
>> Thanks a lot for the reply and review.
>>
>> Your review helps me a lot to proceed further with code.
>>
>> Thanking you ..
>>
>> -
>> Trinath Somanchi
>> ________________________________________
>> From: Edgar Magana Perdomo (eperdomo) <eperdomo at cisco.com<mailto:eperdomo at cisco.com>>
>> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 10:18 PM
>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] BPs for Juno-1
>>
>> My only comment is that the name of the topic should be:
>>
>> bp/fsl-sdn-os-mech-driver
>>
>>
>> Instead of:
>> bp/https
>>
>>
>> I guss we can pass this..
>>
>> Edgar
>>
>> On 5/27/14, 9:23 AM, "trinath.somanchi at freescale.com<mailto:trinath.somanchi at freescale.com>"
>> <trinath.somanchi at freescale.com<mailto:trinath.somanchi at freescale.com>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Kyle
>>>
>>> Kindly consider my BP spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88190/)  too
>>> for Juno1.
>>>
>>> I have been mailing the reviewer to kindly make some to to review the BP
>>> spec.
>>>
>>> I have code too in place for review along with working CI.
>>>
>>> The Code for review : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/78092/
>>>
>>> Kindly please do the needful.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Trinath Somanchi.
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> From: Kyle Mestery <mestery at noironetworks.com<mailto:mestery at noironetworks.com>>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 7:44 PM
>>> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
>>> Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] BPs for Juno-1
>>>
>>> Hi Neutron developers:
>>>
>>> I've spent some time cleaning up the BPs for Juno-1, and they are
>>> documented at the link below [1]. There are a large number of BPs
>>> currently under review right now in neutron-specs. If we land some of
>>> those specs this week, it's possible some of these could make it into
>>> Juno-1, pending review cycles and such. But I just wanted to highlight
>>> that I removed a large number of BPs from targeting Juno-1 now which
>>> did not have specifications linked to them nor specifications which
>>> were actively under review in neutron-specs.
>>>
>>> Also, a gentle reminder that the process for submitting specifications
>>> to Neutron is documented here [2].
>>>
>>> Thanks, and please reach out to me if you have any questions!
>>>
>>> Kyle
>>>
>>> [1] https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/juno-1
>>> [2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints#Neutron
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>