Also I would prefer that we not add "special" tenant names. Roles already had/has problems with "admin", "Member" and "_member_" having special meaning in some projects. ~ Scott On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Vishvananda Ishaya <vishvananda at gmail.com>wrote: > Are you aware that there is already a way to do this through the cli using > quota-class-update? > > http://docs.openstack.org/user-guide-admin/content/cli_set_quotas.html(near the bottom) > > Are you suggesting that we also add the ability to use just regular > quota-update? I’m not sure i see the need for both. > > Vish > > On May 20, 2014, at 9:52 AM, Cazzolato, Sergio J < > sergio.j.cazzolato at intel.com> wrote: > > > I would to hear your thoughts about an idea to add a way to manage the > default quota values through the API. > > > > The idea is to use the current quota api, but sending ''default' instead > of the tenant_id. This change would apply to quota-show and quota-update > methods. > > > > This approach will help to simplify the implementation of another > blueprint named per-flavor-quotas > > > > Feedback? Suggestions? > > > > > > Sergio Juan Cazzolato > > Intel Software Argentina > > > > _______________________________________________ > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140527/de48c242/attachment.html>