Open Stack

Too late.

I just approved the specification.
I don't think there is any need for reverting the blueprint and just
updating the topic in the patch.

Please have a look at Freescale CI - logs are not accessible at the moment.

Salvatore


On 27 May 2014 18:51, trinath.somanchi at freescale.com <
trinath.somanchi at freescale.com> wrote:

> Hi-
>
> Sure!. Will change the topic and update you.
>
> Thanks a lot for the reply and review.
>
> Your review helps me a lot to proceed further with code.
>
> Thanking you ..
>
> -
> Trinath Somanchi
> ________________________________________
> From: Edgar Magana Perdomo (eperdomo) <eperdomo at cisco.com>
> Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 10:18 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [neutron] BPs for Juno-1
>
> My only comment is that the name of the topic should be:
>
> bp/fsl-sdn-os-mech-driver
>
>
> Instead of:
> bp/https
>
>
> I guss we can pass this..
>
> Edgar
>
> On 5/27/14, 9:23 AM, "trinath.somanchi at freescale.com"
> <trinath.somanchi at freescale.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi Kyle
> >
> >Kindly consider my BP spec (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88190/)  too
> >for Juno1.
> >
> >I have been mailing the reviewer to kindly make some to to review the BP
> >spec.
> >
> >I have code too in place for review along with working CI.
> >
> >The Code for review : https://review.openstack.org/#/c/78092/
> >
> >Kindly please do the needful.
> >
> >--
> >Trinath Somanchi.
> >
> >________________________________________
> >From: Kyle Mestery <mestery at noironetworks.com>
> >Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2014 7:44 PM
> >To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> >Subject: [openstack-dev] [neutron] BPs for Juno-1
> >
> >Hi Neutron developers:
> >
> >I've spent some time cleaning up the BPs for Juno-1, and they are
> >documented at the link below [1]. There are a large number of BPs
> >currently under review right now in neutron-specs. If we land some of
> >those specs this week, it's possible some of these could make it into
> >Juno-1, pending review cycles and such. But I just wanted to highlight
> >that I removed a large number of BPs from targeting Juno-1 now which
> >did not have specifications linked to them nor specifications which
> >were actively under review in neutron-specs.
> >
> >Also, a gentle reminder that the process for submitting specifications
> >to Neutron is documented here [2].
> >
> >Thanks, and please reach out to me if you have any questions!
> >
> >Kyle
> >
> >[1] https://launchpad.net/neutron/+milestone/juno-1
> >[2] https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Blueprints#Neutron
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >_______________________________________________
> >OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140527/23ae74a7/attachment.html>