Open Stack

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Sean Dague" <sean at dague.net>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Sent: Friday, May 23, 2014 3:40:16 AM
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [QA] Tempest Release Naming
> 
> On 05/22/2014 08:33 PM, Jeremy Stanley wrote:
> > On 2014-05-22 18:33:34 -0400 (-0400), Matthew Treinish wrote:
> > [...]
> >> I'd like to stick with one scheme and not decide to change it
> >> later on. I figured I should bring this out to a wider audience to
> >> see if there were other suggestions or opinions before I pushed
> >> out the tag, especially because the tags are primarily for the
> >> consumers of Tempest.
> > 
> > I think as long as your release notes clearly indicate what you
> > think can safely be tested with a given release of Tempest, it
> > should be versioned just like any other piece of software (which is
> > to say, with version numbers chosen by one or more humans to
> > reflect
> > the degree of improvement/breakage reflected within the release, a
> > la "Semantic Versioning").
> 
> Given that we're not really going to have major / minor bumps at this
> point (more a continous roll), I might argue that we should just go
> Firefox on it and bump the integer on every release.
> 
> Tempest 1 is now, Tempest 2 is Julyish, Tempest 3 is at Juno, Tempest
> 4
> is next winter, etc.
> 
> 	-Sean

+1
very practical, very simple. clearly independent of Openstack releases

> 
> --
> Sean Dague
> http://dague.net
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>