Open Stack

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

+1, I also don't see any significant value in using generic names
instead of project names, while the drawbacks are obvious.

/Ihar

On 23/05/14 14:30, Sergey Lukjanov wrote:
> +1 for using program codename.
> 
> So, we'll need to rename some existing program-named spec repos.
> 
> On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 3:40 PM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org> wrote:
>> James E. Blair wrote:
>>> [...]
>>> When I look at the two of those, I have to admit that it's the second
>>> one I find more intuitive and I'm pretty sure I'll end up calling it
>>> 'sahara-specs' in common usage no matter the name.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Also the program "codename" is actually defined in programs.yaml:
>>
>> http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/programs.yaml
>>
>> It generally matches the name of the main project, but could potentially
>> be different, in corner cases.
>>
>> --
>> Thierry Carrez (ttx)
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 
> 
> 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJTf0AuAAoJEC5aWaUY1u57N+0H/3gsw+nBB3f+ilk0w7pgFpD3
pQaS96WwNn0crCXPdE+g/5/lyGHLCshyQXr9N/3HPJN0C9oM0bW9fh9F3uy6TJW3
ymHHl/GTqEW9Iz4A/omXUTsOhbWm2MnzUx0bLYEo3OOQS8ZB9p8lKfS0MfUPsDUk
Tb46ABR7uf3rdzDxvYVdvPvwJaOP5rkASm2dxcmpQM6m9wWbewpkyagZr/FQfUW6
s+ZO6sAtSl940b6YkLO+jLixnI4EM08/2+xIXnKF0NHHjD9aJZfCoIhiZ9w0oonq
3lOWqT2RSV1/1Qqcs7G279cdDqrrmrD7eR+6xpTBxKQokw0BZ81oSXMz9S+TgSc=
=0PM9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----