James E. Blair wrote: > [...] > When I look at the two of those, I have to admit that it's the second > one I find more intuitive and I'm pretty sure I'll end up calling it > 'sahara-specs' in common usage no matter the name. +1 Also the program "codename" is actually defined in programs.yaml: http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/governance/tree/reference/programs.yaml It generally matches the name of the main project, but could potentially be different, in corner cases. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx)