Open Stack

For everyone's awareness, Alexis proposed a spec related to this:
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/94910

-Ben

On 05/20/2014 05:05 PM, James Polley wrote:
> I spoke to JP offline and confirmed that the link to 85418 should have been
> a link to https://review.openstack.org/#/c/88252
> 
> I think that
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-incubator-rationalise-ui and
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-devtest.sh-refactoring-blueprintare
> the closest things to documentation we've got about this. Now that we
> have the specs repo, perhaps we should be creating a spec and moving the
> discussion there.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Sullivan, Jon Paul <
> JonPaul.Sullivan at hp.com> wrote:
> 
>>  Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>> There are a number of reviews[1][2] where new environment variables are
>> being disliked, leading to -1 or -2 code reviews because new environment
>> variables are added.  It is looking like this is becoming a policy.
>>
>>
>>
>> If this is a policy, then could that be stated, and an alternate mechanism
>> made available so that any reviews adding environment variables can use the
>> replacement mechanism, please?
>>
>>
>>
>> Otherwise, some guidelines for developers where environment variables are
>> acceptable or not would equally be useful.
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] https://review.openstack.org/85009
>>
>> [2] https://review.openstack.org/85418
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> ,: JonPaul.Sullivan at hp.com J *Cloud Services - @hpcloud*
>> (: +353 (91) 75 4169
>>
>>
>>
>> Postal Address: Hewlett-Packard Galway Limited, Ballybrit Business Park,
>> Galway.
>>
>> Registered Office: Hewlett-Packard Galway Limited, 63-74 Sir John
>> Rogerson's Quay, Dublin 2.
>>
>> Registered Number: 361933
>>
>>
>>
>> The contents of this message and any attachments to it are confidential
>> and may be legally privileged. If you have received this message in error
>> you should delete it from your system immediately and advise the sender.
>>
>>
>>
>> To any recipient of this message within HP, unless otherwise stated, you
>> should consider this message and attachments as "HP CONFIDENTIAL".
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>