Open Stack

HI,
I would happy to get explanation of what is the difference between Adv
Service Management<https://docs.google.com/file/d/0Bz-bErEEHJxLTGY4NUVvTzRDaEk/edit>from
the Service VM and NFVO
orchestration<http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/88/slides/slides-88-opsawg-6.pdf>from
NFV Mano.
The most interesting part if service provider management as part of the
service catalog.

Thanks,
Dmitry


On Wed, May 21, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata at gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi, I will also attend the NFV IRC meeting.
>
> thanks,
> Isaku Yamahata
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 01:23:22PM -0700,
> Stephen Wong <s3wong at midokura.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >     I am part of the ServiceVM team and I will attend the NFV IRC
> meetings.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > - Stephen
> >
> >
> > On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 8:59 AM, Chris Wright <chrisw at sous-sol.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > > * Balaji.P at freescale.com (Balaji.P at freescale.com) wrote:
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Kyle Mestery [mailto:mestery at noironetworks.com]
> > > > > Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 12:19 AM
> > > > > To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> > > > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design
> summit
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Ian Wells <ijw.ubuntu at cack.org.uk
> >
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > I think the Service VM discussion resolved itself in a way that
> > > > > > reduces the problem to a form of NFV - there are standing issues
> > > using
> > > > > > VMs for services, orchestration is probably not a responsibility
> that
> > > > > > lies in Neutron, and as such the importance is in identifying the
> > > > > > problems with the plumbing features of Neutron that cause
> > > > > > implementation difficulties.  The end result will be that VMs
> > > > > > implementing tenant services and implementing NFV should be much
> the
> > > > > > same, with the addition of offering a multitenant interface to
> > > > > Openstack users on the tenant service VM case.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Geoff Arnold is dealing with the collating of information from
> people
> > > > > > that have made the attempt to implement service VMs.  The problem
> > > > > > areas should fall out of his effort.  I also suspect that the key
> > > > > > points of NFV that cause problems (for instance, dealing with
> VLANs
> > > > > > and trunking) will actually appear quite high up the service VM
> list
> > > as
> > > > > well.
> > > > > > --
> > > > > There is a weekly meeting for the Service VM project [1], I hope
> some
> > > > > representatives from the NFB sub-project can make it to this
> meeting
> > > and
> > > > > participate there.
> > > > [P Balaji-B37839] I agree with Kyle, so that we will have enough
> synch
> > > between Service VM and NFV goals.
> > >
> > > Makes good sense.  Will make sure to get someone there.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > -chris
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> --
> Isaku Yamahata <isaku.yamahata at gmail.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140521/62133cc8/attachment.html>