Open Stack

Reminder that the first meeting will kick off today at 1500 UTC on
#openstack-meeting-3  Please add agenda items to the etherpad if you
wish to discuss them this week:

  https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-libvirt-meeting-agenda

Regards,
Daniel

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 01:10:40PM -0400, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> Hi Nova developers,
> 
> Since Nova already has sub-teams for HyperV, VMWare, and XenAPI, I feel that
> it would be a worthwhile effort to introduce a sub-team + meeting for the
> Nova Libvirt driver:
> 
>     https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Nova#Nova_subteams
>     https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Libvirt
>     https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-libvirt-meeting-agenda
> 
> I have arbitrarily picked Tuesdays at 1500 UTC on IRC #openstack-meeting-3
> as the time + place for the meeting. If this turns out to be horrible for
> a significant number of people, we can discuss alternate times (as long as
> they are not friday evenings ;-), or alternate between 2 times. Currently
> this time point works out as
> 
>     08:00 San Francisco
>     11:00 Boston
>     15:00 UTC
>     16:00 London
>     17:00 Berlin
>     20:30 Mumbai
>     23:00 Bejing
>     24:00 Tokyo
> 
>     http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?hour=15&min=00&sec=0p1=0
> 
> So I suggest the first meeting take place next week:
> 
>    Tuesday May 20th at 15:00 UTC
> 
> I don't want to add bureaucracy to the libvirt driver development workflow.
> Rather I intend that this meeting is a way to facilitate libvirt related
> discussions between different parties/companies and to resolve roadblocks
> that people working on libvirt may be facing. It should also be a place for
> other OpenStack teams (Neutron/Glance/Infra/etc) to come to meeting the
> Nova libvirt team and raise topics they have.
> 
> 
> If you want to attend this meeting, please record topics for discussion
> in the etherpad (and put your name + IRC nick against items)
> 
>    https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/nova-libvirt-meeting-agenda
> 
> 
> Historically KVM / QEMU have got the majority of attention from libvirt
> developers, to the extent that we (unfortunately) caused breakage of both
> LXC and Xen during Icehouse. From mail and design summit discussions, it
> seems there is a critical mass of people interested in raising the quality
> of LXC and Xen during Juno and getting gate CI up & running. So I think
> this meeting would be a good place for those interested in Libvirt LXC &
> Xen support to coordinate their initial efforts / planning.
> 
> Regards,
> Daniel
> -- 
> |: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
> |: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
> |: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
> |: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: http://berrange.com      -o-    http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org              -o-             http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org       -o-         http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org       -o-       http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|