[openstack-dev] OpenStack-dev Digest, Vol 25, Issue 39
Amol Salunkhe
amolsalunkhe19 at gmail.com
Thu May 15 13:26:36 UTC 2014
On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 5:30 PM,
<openstack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org>wrote:
> Send OpenStack-dev mailing list submissions to
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> openstack-dev-request at lists.openstack.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> openstack-dev-owner at lists.openstack.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of OpenStack-dev digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. Re: [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model? (Kevin Benton)
> 2. [HEAT] Discussion: How to list nested stack resources.
> (Nilakhya Chatterjee)
> 3. Re: [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit (punal patel)
> 4. Re: [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit (IWAMOTO Toshihiro)
> 5. Re: B203 table 6 for Neutron//Re: SDN NBI Core APIs consumed
> by OpenStack: Wednesday May 14th at 10:30-11am in the developer
> lounge at 3rd floor (Martinx - ?????)
> 6. Re: [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model? (Craig Tracey)
> 7. Re: [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit (Luke Gorrie)
> 8. Re: [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model? (Stephen Balukoff)
> 9. Re: [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model? (IWAMOTO Toshihiro)
> 10. Re: [HEAT] Discussion: How to list nested stack resources.
> (Qiming Teng)
> 11. Re: [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey (Samuel Bercovici)
> 12. Re: [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit (CARVER, PAUL)
> 13. Re: [Neutron] Meet up time at the summit for a POD; Re:
> Pluggable IPAM (Maksym Lobur)
> 14. Re: [Neutron] Meet up time at the summit for a POD; Re:
> Pluggable IPAM (Justin Hammond)
> 15. [barbican] any barbican devs at summit? (Michael Dorman)
> 16. Re: [Neutron][LBaaS]LBaaS 1st Session etherpad (Samuel Bercovici)
> 17. Re: [barbican] any barbican devs at summit? (Douglas Mendizabal)
> 18. Re: [barbican] any barbican devs at summit? (Michael Dorman)
> 19. Re: [Neutron][LBaaS]LBaaS 1st Session etherpad
> (Vijay Venkatachalam)
> 20. Re: [Neutron][LBaaS]LBaaS 1st Session etherpad (Samuel Bercovici)
> 21. [Nova][Pci] about nova resize with pci device (Xiaoding (B))
> 22. [heat]How to get metadata when vm in a network without dhcp?
> (xuanlangjian)
> 23. Re: [keystone] Service scoped role definition (David Chadwick)
> 24. Re: [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model? (Eugene Nikanorov)
> 25. Re: [heat]How to get metadata when vm in a network without
> dhcp? (Qiming Teng)
> 26. [Neutron] Monitoring agent (Zang MingJie)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 13:48:37 -0700
> From: Kevin Benton <blak111 at gmail.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAO_F6JMXHH72mX2so8EQVVvGxVJUGBfCmsJDnzKR9ze-qZLHtQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> >On a related note, does it make sense to create an lbaas IRC topic
> channel? #openstack-lbaas?
>
> Have you found that #openstack-neutron is too busy for LBaaS discussions?
> The downside to moving LBaaS discussions to a separate channel from the
> general neutron channel is that many neutron developers are left out of the
> discussion.
>
> --
> Kevin Benton
>
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Craig Tracey <craig at craigtracey.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > From what I heard last night, it sounds like there has been some
> consensus
> > achieved around the LBaaS object model. Unfortunately, I missed this
> > ad-hoc conversation. Is someone capturing this information and/or
> perhaps
> > posting to the list? someplace else?
> >
> > On a related note, does it make sense to create an lbaas IRC topic
> > channel? #openstack-lbaas? Just thinking that a dedicated channel might
> > help to make the weekly meetings more productive with less crosstalk.
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Best,
> > Craig
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Kevin Benton
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140514/2321a34a/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 03:02:00 +0530
> From: Nilakhya Chatterjee <nilakhya.chatterjee at globallogic.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [HEAT] Discussion: How to list nested stack
> resources.
> Message-ID:
> <CAPPfVQ3rP+=x0=Xa1F_=
> vY60d1On0fk3_wKC-cXS9y+WKuH-ZA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi All,
>
> I recently tried to create a nested stack with the following example :
>
> http://paste.openstack.org/show/79156/
>
> heat resource-list gives only "MyStack" but intention should be to list
> all the resources created by the nested templates, as also pointed by the
> command help:
>
> resource-list Show list of resources belonging to a stack
>
>
>
> Let me know if this requires a BP to be created for discussion.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
>
> Nilakhya | Consultant Engineering
> GlobalLogic
> P +x.xxx.xxx.xxxx M +91.989.112.5770 S skype
> www.globallogic.com
> <http://www.globallogic.com/>
> http://www.globallogic.com/email_disclaimer.txt
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140515/5b137911/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 3
> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 14:40:03 -0700
> From: punal patel <punal.patel at gmail.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit
> Message-ID:
> <CAEBiwMRvzgNNyAz3kPUz+_=
> 2GVuanAFHfOGc_icu9886K+2xmg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Will this be recorded? or can I join webex?
>
> Thank You,
> Punal Patel
>
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Chris Wright <chrisw at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Thursday at 1:30 PM in the Neutron Pod we'll do
> > an NFV BoF. If you are at design summit and
> > interested in Neutron + NFV please come join us.
> >
> > thanks,
> > -chris
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140514/222da877/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 4
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 06:53:23 +0900
> From: IWAMOTO Toshihiro <iwamoto at valinux.co.jp>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit
> Message-ID: <20140514215323.BF6D5489F5 at mail.valinux.co.jp>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> At Wed, 14 May 2014 14:40:03 -0700,
> punal patel wrote:
> >
> > [1 <multipart/alternative (7bit)>]
> > [1.1 <text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)>]
> > Will this be recorded? or can I join webex?
> >
>
> There's no official recording facility. You may be able to ask
> someone to record or stream.
> BTW, I think it is a good idea to try to take discussion memo on
> etherpad, just as official design summit programs.
>
>
> > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:06 AM, Chris Wright <chrisw at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Thursday at 1:30 PM in the Neutron Pod we'll do
> > > an NFV BoF. If you are at design summit and
> > > interested in Neutron + NFV please come join us.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > -chris
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> > [1.2 <text/html; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)>]
> >
> > [2 <text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)>]
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 5
> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 18:54:03 -0300
> From: Martinx - ????? <thiagocmartinsc at gmail.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] B203 table 6 for Neutron//Re: SDN NBI
> Core APIs consumed by OpenStack: Wednesday May 14th at 10:30-11am
> in
> the developer lounge at 3rd floor
> Message-ID:
> <CAJSM8J0Kq3t_jdymA_o1d6k_vn6i25Z5+K=
> RAgpSVcSheJHzaA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hello!
>
> This is very an interesting topic!
>
> I would like to talk about one idea I had, which is related to: "1.9. API
> for VPN".
>
> I think it would be awesome, for example, when dealing with IPv6-Only
> "Projects (Tenants) Networks", the VPNs should use `Opportunistic
> Encryption`, this way, the VPNs will be established "by default" without
> any user interaction. Then, IPSec VPN for `IPv6 <-> IPv6` subnets will be
> always there, safely interconnecting the subnets, everywhere, even across
> different "Regions" or across different "Projects" (old "Tenants"
> terminology).
>
> I already started a topic about this but, I'm a bit busy these days... I'll
> reply there and I'm drawing a blueprint for it...
>
> Best!
> Thiago
>
>
> On 14 May 2014 12:16, Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting at huawei.com> wrote:
>
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Below is the main conclusion from this meeting.
> >
> > We will work on the following SDN NBI Core APIs at the priority per
> > Neutron's interest.
> > 2, 7, 10, 9, 11.
> >
> > 1.2 APIs for connection between OpenStack Neutron and controller
> >
> > OpenStack is widely used and deployed in cloud scenarios.OpenStack-based
> > data center is becoming mainstream.
> >
> > There should be APIs for connection between SDN controller and OpenStack
> > Neutron.
> >
> >
> >
> > 1.7 APIs for Virtual-Tenant-Network (VTN)
> >
> > VTN allows users and developers to design and deploy virtual networks
> > without the need to know the physical network. This is very useful in
> > data center.
> >
> > There should be APIs for virtual tenant network.
> >
> >
> > 1.10 APIs for QoS
> >
> > QoS is usually for end user application. For example, the UC-SDN-Use-Case
> > needs the network to guarantee its flow QoS to improve the user?s QoE.
> >
> > There should be APIs for QoS.
> >
> >
> > 1.9 APIs for VPN
> >
> > VPN is also widely use in enterprise network, interconnectionbetween data
> > centers and mobile environments.
> >
> > The management and operation of VPN are necessary. There should be APIs
> > for VPN.
> >
> > The VPN may include the following type
> >
> > L2 VPN
> >
> > L3 VPN
> >
> >
> > 1.11 APIs for network stats/state
> >
> > The network stats/state is needed by application so that the application
> can
> > react with the corresponding policy.
> >
> > There should be APIs for network stats/state.
> >
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Tina
> >
> > On May 14, 2014, at 10:00 AM, "Tina TSOU" <Tina.Tsou.Zouting at huawei.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Dear all,
> >
> > Place is changed to B203 table 6 for Networking (Neutron), Design Summit
> > Pod area.
> >
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Tina
> >
> > On May 13, 2014, at 10:00 PM, "Tina TSOU" <Tina.Tsou.Zouting at huawei.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Dear Stackers,
> >
> >
> >
> > We are setting up a meeting to SDN NBI Core APIs consumed by OpenStack.
> > Attached is the material for your reading pleasure.
> >
> >
> >
> > The meeting is planned for:
> >
> > * Wednesday May 14th at 10:30-11am in the developer lounge
> > at 3rd floor .*
> >
> > Look forward to meeting many of you then.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Tina
> >
> >
> >
> > <NBI Core APIs.docx>
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140514/5814aa58/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 6
> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 18:04:53 -0400
> From: Craig Tracey <craig at craigtracey.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?
> Message-ID:
> <CAEOAZ=
> H61u0xYPXKxopfXLWOrsR6iY+psy3jc5OduU7J65X3kQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Thanks Stephen,
>
> One nit and one question....
> - For each of the tables with status fields we will want to have
> status_description fields as well. This is already a part of the V2
> models.
> - How does this model handle things like implementation-specific options
> and/or things like additional headers? I'm thinking of some of those very
> common cases with http/https...X-Forwarded-For, httpclose, etc.
>
> Best,
> Craig
>
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Stephen Balukoff <sbalukoff at bluebox.net
> >wrote:
>
> > Aah-- and here's a small error correction. :)
> >
> > Please also note:
> > * We're not yet in consensus on the L7 or SSL related objects, but the
> > Loadbalancer, Listener, Pool, and Member should probably not change at
> this
> > point (unless there are major objections voiced in the very near term).
> > * I've tried to use color coordination to indicate different logical
> parts
> > that can probably be implemented in different blueprints / by different
> > engineering teams.
> > * The LBtoListener object is grayed out because it will need to exist in
> > the database (to allow Listeners to be re-used, solving the IPv4 + IPv6
> > common use case), but should not be directly addressable via the user
> API.
> > (This is also the reason it's got no tenant_id.)
> > * The vip group and vip anti group stuff is meant to solve the vip
> > colocation / apolocation problem. These are optional objects that don't
> > need to be created unless a user has colocation / apolocation needs.
> (I'd
> > be happy to run anyone through the logic on how these work, as it's
> > probably not immediately intuitive.)
> >
> > Stephen
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Stephen Balukoff <
> sbalukoff at bluebox.net>wrote:
> >
> >> Also, apologies for the crappy formatting. I like gv files as they're
> >> easily tracked in a text-based revision control system (like git) that
> >> depends on useful diffs to do code reviews. But sometimes the layout it
> >> chooses is a little dumb.
> >>
> >> Stephen
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Stephen Balukoff <
> sbalukoff at bluebox.net
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Craig,
> >>>
> >>> I'm attaching the latest object model diagram as discussed with the RAX
> >>> team last night, Samuel and Eugene. Note that we don't necessarily have
> >>> HP's blessing on this model yet, nor do we have Neutron core developer
> buy
> >>> in. But in any case, here it is.
> >>>
> >>> Also, I think the #openstack-lbaas channel is a great idea!
> >>>
> >>> Stephen
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Craig Tracey <craig at craigtracey.com
> >wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi all,
> >>>>
> >>>> From what I heard last night, it sounds like there has been some
> >>>> consensus achieved around the LBaaS object model. Unfortunately, I
> missed
> >>>> this ad-hoc conversation. Is someone capturing this information
> and/or
> >>>> perhaps posting to the list? someplace else?
> >>>>
> >>>> On a related note, does it make sense to create an lbaas IRC topic
> >>>> channel? #openstack-lbaas? Just thinking that a dedicated channel
> might
> >>>> help to make the weekly meetings more productive with less crosstalk.
> >>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>
> >>>> Best,
> >>>> Craig
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Stephen Balukoff
> >>> Blue Box Group, LLC
> >>> (800)613-4305 x807
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Stephen Balukoff
> >> Blue Box Group, LLC
> >> (800)613-4305 x807
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Stephen Balukoff
> > Blue Box Group, LLC
> > (800)613-4305 x807
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140514/92992894/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 00:15:09 +0200
> From: Luke Gorrie <luke at tail-f.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Cc: "Ian Wells \(iawells\)" <iawells at cisco.com>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit
> Message-ID:
> <CAA2XHbcO+GN9W+-kpSWVAwZFKFcn3=
> JXf8foJoSQgjyiUHiJTw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Can't wait :-).
>
> On 14 May 2014 19:06, Chris Wright <chrisw at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Thursday at 1:30 PM in the Neutron Pod we'll do
> > an NFV BoF. If you are at design summit and
> > interested in Neutron + NFV please come join us.
> >
> > thanks,
> > -chris
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 8
> Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 15:38:18 -0700
> From: Stephen Balukoff <sbalukoff at bluebox.net>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?
> Message-ID:
> <CAAGw+ZqH=
> fwEwRSHehf9cRCeSphpr-uX9G-Sw-DwOxmbaJtpig at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Craig,
>
> I was attempting to avoid haproxy-specific terminology here, but some of
> those attributes are on the listener (ie. keepalive = 0 would be equivalent
> to httpclose). Other options (like adding headers) are expressed through
> the layer-7 functionality.
>
> So, we have yet to update the API to correspond with this object diagram,
> but if you recall the API I linked on the list a couple weeks ago (
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/129Da7zEk5p437_88_IKiQnNuWXzWaS_CpQVm4JBeQnc/edit?usp=sharing
> )
> look in the section on L7 policies and L7 rules. (Note also that we
> don't
> yet have group consensus on the specifics of implementing the L7 stuff--
> but adding headers would definitely fall in that category, eh.)
>
> Stephen
>
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 3:04 PM, Craig Tracey <craig at craigtracey.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Stephen,
> >
> > One nit and one question....
> > - For each of the tables with status fields we will want to have
> > status_description fields as well. This is already a part of the V2
> models.
> > - How does this model handle things like implementation-specific options
> > and/or things like additional headers? I'm thinking of some of those very
> > common cases with http/https...X-Forwarded-For, httpclose, etc.
> >
> > Best,
> > Craig
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Stephen Balukoff <sbalukoff at bluebox.net
> >wrote:
> >
> >> Aah-- and here's a small error correction. :)
> >>
> >> Please also note:
> >> * We're not yet in consensus on the L7 or SSL related objects, but the
> >> Loadbalancer, Listener, Pool, and Member should probably not change at
> this
> >> point (unless there are major objections voiced in the very near term).
> >> * I've tried to use color coordination to indicate different logical
> >> parts that can probably be implemented in different blueprints / by
> >> different engineering teams.
> >> * The LBtoListener object is grayed out because it will need to exist in
> >> the database (to allow Listeners to be re-used, solving the IPv4 + IPv6
> >> common use case), but should not be directly addressable via the user
> API.
> >> (This is also the reason it's got no tenant_id.)
> >> * The vip group and vip anti group stuff is meant to solve the vip
> >> colocation / apolocation problem. These are optional objects that don't
> >> need to be created unless a user has colocation / apolocation needs.
> (I'd
> >> be happy to run anyone through the logic on how these work, as it's
> >> probably not immediately intuitive.)
> >>
> >> Stephen
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:22 AM, Stephen Balukoff <
> sbalukoff at bluebox.net
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> Also, apologies for the crappy formatting. I like gv files as they're
> >>> easily tracked in a text-based revision control system (like git) that
> >>> depends on useful diffs to do code reviews. But sometimes the layout it
> >>> chooses is a little dumb.
> >>>
> >>> Stephen
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Stephen Balukoff <
> >>> sbalukoff at bluebox.net> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Craig,
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm attaching the latest object model diagram as discussed with the
> RAX
> >>>> team last night, Samuel and Eugene. Note that we don't necessarily
> have
> >>>> HP's blessing on this model yet, nor do we have Neutron core
> developer buy
> >>>> in. But in any case, here it is.
> >>>>
> >>>> Also, I think the #openstack-lbaas channel is a great idea!
> >>>>
> >>>> Stephen
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Craig Tracey <craig at craigtracey.com
> >wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> From what I heard last night, it sounds like there has been some
> >>>>> consensus achieved around the LBaaS object model. Unfortunately, I
> missed
> >>>>> this ad-hoc conversation. Is someone capturing this information
> and/or
> >>>>> perhaps posting to the list? someplace else?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On a related note, does it make sense to create an lbaas IRC topic
> >>>>> channel? #openstack-lbaas? Just thinking that a dedicated channel
> might
> >>>>> help to make the weekly meetings more productive with less crosstalk.
> >>>>> Thoughts?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best,
> >>>>> Craig
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >>>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >>>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Stephen Balukoff
> >>>> Blue Box Group, LLC
> >>>> (800)613-4305 x807
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Stephen Balukoff
> >>> Blue Box Group, LLC
> >>> (800)613-4305 x807
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Stephen Balukoff
> >> Blue Box Group, LLC
> >> (800)613-4305 x807
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >>
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Stephen Balukoff
> Blue Box Group, LLC
> (800)613-4305 x807
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140514/6f5c7bfc/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 9
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 08:24:03 +0900
> From: IWAMOTO Toshihiro <iwamoto at valinux.co.jp>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?
> Message-ID: <20140514232403.ABC8D489F5 at mail.valinux.co.jp>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>
> At Wed, 14 May 2014 10:18:29 -0700,
> Stephen Balukoff wrote:
> >
> > [1 <multipart/alternative (7bit)>]
> > [1.1 <text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)>]
> > Hi Craig,
> >
> > I'm attaching the latest object model diagram as discussed with the RAX
> > team last night, Samuel and Eugene. Note that we don't necessarily have
> > HP's blessing on this model yet, nor do we have Neutron core developer
> buy
> > in. But in any case, here it is.
>
> Sorry for jumping into a meta-argument,
> but what the LBaaS community needs to do first is to figure out how to
> make the neutron community agree on a LBaaS proposal.
> On the other hand, the neutron community (or the core?) needs to make
> it clear that what criteria or process is required to approve some
> LBaaS idea (obj. model, API, whatsoever).
>
>
> I'm sorry to say (again) that not much people have energy to follow
> and check out small differences in those large pictures of LBaaS
> object models.
>
> --
> IWAMOTO Toshihiro
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 10
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 07:30:07 +0800
> From: Qiming Teng <tengqim at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [HEAT] Discussion: How to list nested
> stack resources.
> Message-ID: <20140514233006.GA26522 at localhost>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> # heat stack-create -f example.yaml
> # heat stack-list
>
> Assume the stack id is: 5d44526e-e75c-4cec-aeea-252d6d15254b
>
> # heat resource-list 5d44526e-e75c-4cec-aeea-252d6d15254b
>
> You get the resource named 'MyStack'. To check the details:
>
> # heat resource-show 5d44526e-e75c-4cec-aeea-252d6d15254b MyStack
>
> You now get the physical_resource_id for MyStack. Let's assume it to
> be: 2ab05ea0-8cae-40b9-99cc-3aaf69badde6
>
> # heat resource-list 2ab05ea0-8cae-40b9-99cc-3aaf69badde6
>
> Now you get your resource whose type is 'file:///..../heat.yaml'.
> Its name could be a random string. You can check that resource using:
>
> # heat resource-show 2ab05ea0-8cae-40b9-99cc-3aaf69badde6 <name>
>
> The process is a little bit dirty, though doable.
>
> If you want to submit a blueprint on this, it would be desirable to have
> it generic enough to cover all nested stack cases.
>
> Regards,
> - Qiming
>
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 03:02:00AM +0530, Nilakhya Chatterjee wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I recently tried to create a nested stack with the following example :
> >
> > http://paste.openstack.org/show/79156/
> >
> > heat resource-list gives only "MyStack" but intention should be to list
> > all the resources created by the nested templates, as also pointed by the
> > command help:
> >
> > resource-list Show list of resources belonging to a stack
> >
> >
> >
> > Let me know if this requires a BP to be created for discussion.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > --
> >
> > Nilakhya | Consultant Engineering
> > GlobalLogic
> > P +x.xxx.xxx.xxxx M +91.989.112.5770 S skype
> > www.globallogic.com
> > <http://www.globallogic.com/>
> > http://www.globallogic.com/email_disclaimer.txt
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 11
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 01:40:20 +0000
> From: Samuel Bercovici <SamuelB at Radware.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey
> Message-ID: <AAF9C97C-5D2E-457F-BED4-4CB197C30E45 at Radware.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="cp1255"
>
> 11 people have responded so far.
> Please note that tomorrow is the last day to do the survey.
> I will close the survey and publish the results sometimes tomorrow night.
>
> Regards,
> -Sam.
>
> On 9 ???? 2014, at 15:59, "Stephen Balukoff" <sbalukoff at bluebox.net
> <mailto:sbalukoff at bluebox.net>> wrote:
>
> Sam,
>
> That deadline seems reasonable to me. I should have time later today or
> later this weekend to fill it out.
>
> Thanks,
> Stephen
>
>
> On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 9:21 AM, Samuel Bercovici <SamuelB at radware.com
> <mailto:SamuelB at radware.com>> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 9 people have filled the survey so far.
> See attached pdf.
>
> Regards,
> -Sam.
>
>
> From: Samuel Bercovici
> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 2:51 PM
>
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> I think that it is a good feedback to prioritize features.
> I can publish the results in time for the 2nd LBaaS meeting (so deadline
> would be end of 15th May ?summit time?)
> Is this acceptable?
>
> -Sam.
>
>
>
> From: Stephen Balukoff [mailto:sbalukoff at bluebox.net]
> Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 2:17 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey
>
> Hi Samuel--
>
> I've been heads down working on API proposal review documentation, and
> haven't had time to fill it out yet. Do you have a deadline by which we
> should have filled out the survey to get our voices heard?
>
> Thanks,
> Stephen
>
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Samuel Bercovici <SamuelB at radware.com
> <mailto:SamuelB at radware.com>> wrote:
>
> 6 people have completed the survey so far.
>
>
> From: Samuel Bercovici
> Sent: Tuesday, May 06, 2014 10:56 AM
>
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> The survey is now live via: http://eSurv.org?u=lbaas_project_user
> The password is: lbaas
>
> The survey includes all the tenant facing use cases from
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ewl95yxAMq2fO0Z6Dz6fL-w2FScERQXQR1-mXuSINis/edit?usp=sharing
> Please try and fill the survey this week so we can have enough information
> to base decisions next week.
>
> Regards,
> -Sam.
>
>
>
> From: Samuel Bercovici
> Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 4:52 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey
>
> Hi,
>
> I will not freeze the document to allow people to work on requirements
> which are not tenant facing (ex: operator, etc.)
> I think that we have enough use cases for tenant facing capabilities to
> reflect most common use cases.
> I am in the process of creation a survey in surveymonkey for tenant facing
> use cases and hope to send it to ML ASAP.
>
> Regards,
> -Sam.
>
>
> From: Samuel Bercovici
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 8:40 PM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Cc: Samuel Bercovici
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]User Stories and sruvey
>
> Hi Everyone!
>
> To assist in evaluating the use cases that matter and since we now have
> ~45 use cases, I would like to propose to conduct a survey using something
> like surveymonkey.
> The idea is to have a non-anonymous survey listing the use cases and ask
> you identify and vote.
> Then we will publish the results and can prioritize based on this.
>
> To do so in a timely manner, I would like to freeze the document for
> editing and allow only comments by Monday May 5th 08:00AMUTC and publish
> the survey link to ML ASAP after that.
>
> Please let me know if this is acceptable.
>
> Regards,
> -Sam.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
> --
> Stephen Balukoff
> Blue Box Group, LLC
> (800)613-4305 x807<tel:%28800%29613-4305%20x807>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
> --
> Stephen Balukoff
> Blue Box Group, LLC
> (800)613-4305 x807
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140515/2847c196/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 12
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 02:18:25 +0000
> From: "CARVER, PAUL" <pc2929 at att.com>
> To: "openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit
> Message-ID: <i0nikc1a9xj86hgprn24619d.1400113634851 at email.android.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> I'm planning to go to the neutron policy session at 1:30 but I'd like to
> find a chance to meet you and say hi. I'll be at the summit through Friday.
>
>
>
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Luke Gorrie <luke at tail-f.com>
> Date:
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Cc: "Ian Wells (iawells)" <iawells at cisco.com>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][NFV] NFV BoF at design summit
>
>
> Can't wait :-).
>
> On 14 May 2014 19:06, Chris Wright <chrisw at redhat.com> wrote:
> > Thursday at 1:30 PM in the Neutron Pod we'll do
> > an NFV BoF. If you are at design summit and
> > interested in Neutron + NFV please come join us.
> >
> > thanks,
> > -chris
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140515/8371d963/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 13
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 06:02:15 +0300
> From: Maksym Lobur <mlobur at mirantis.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Meet up time at the summit for
> a POD; Re: Pluggable IPAM
> Message-ID:
> <CAAUJdD48=
> fxhvuVAtYM+E5grqvrJv6OVg_4cm12NswoZNWBzyQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> I'm sorry, you meant May 15, right?
> What is the neutron POD?
>
> Best regards,
> Max Lobur,
> Python Developer, Mirantis, Inc.
>
> Mobile: +38 (093) 665 14 28
> Skype: max_lobur
>
> 38, Lenina ave. Kharkov, Ukraine
> www.mirantis.com
> www.mirantis.ru
>
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Justin Hammond <
> justin.hammond at rackspace.com> wrote:
>
> > Signed up for 11:30 AM, May 14 at the neutron POD.
> >
> > On 5/14/14 12:29 PM, "Justin Hammond" <justin.hammond at RACKSPACE.COM>
> > wrote:
> >
> > >John Voss and I believe Thursday (May 15) would be the best time to do
> > >this. I will write it on the board.
> > >
> > >On 5/14/14 11:59 AM, "Justin Hammond" <justin.hammond at RACKSPACE.COM>
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >>I also intend on advertising this during the core-refactoring session
> in
> > >>the etherpad. Please pay attention to that if you're there!
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>_______________________________________________
> > >>OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > >>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > >>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> > >
> > >_______________________________________________
> > >OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > >OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140515/57955317/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 14
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 03:16:13 +0000
> From: Justin Hammond <justin.hammond at RACKSPACE.COM>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Meet up time at the summit for
> a POD; Re: Pluggable IPAM
> Message-ID: <CF99A968.1EEB3%justin.hammond at rackspace.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Yes sorry. May 15. The neutron pod is on level 2. You can get to it from
> level 3 if you go into the developer lounge, go down the spiral staircase
> surrounded by the curtains, then hang a slight right. I believe it is room
> 204? It says 'neutron' on the list of PODs.
>
> From: Maksym Lobur <mlobur at mirantis.com<mailto:mlobur at mirantis.com>>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >>
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 06:02:15 +0300
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Meet up time at the summit for a
> POD; Re: Pluggable IPAM
>
> I'm sorry, you meant May 15, right?
> What is the neutron POD?
>
> Best regards,
> Max Lobur,
> Python Developer, Mirantis, Inc.
>
> Mobile: +38 (093) 665 14 28
> Skype: max_lobur
>
> 38, Lenina ave. Kharkov, Ukraine
> www.mirantis.com<http://www.mirantis.com>
> www.mirantis.ru<http://www.mirantis.ru>
>
>
> On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Justin Hammond <
> justin.hammond at rackspace.com<mailto:justin.hammond at rackspace.com>> wrote:
> Signed up for 11:30 AM, May 14 at the neutron POD.
>
> On 5/14/14 12:29 PM, "Justin Hammond" <justin.hammond at RACKSPACE.COM
> <mailto:justin.hammond at RACKSPACE.COM>> wrote:
>
> >John Voss and I believe Thursday (May 15) would be the best time to do
> >this. I will write it on the board.
> >
> >On 5/14/14 11:59 AM, "Justin Hammond" <justin.hammond at RACKSPACE.COM
> <mailto:justin.hammond at RACKSPACE.COM>>
> >wrote:
> >
> >>I also intend on advertising this during the core-refactoring session in
> >>the etherpad. Please pay attention to that if you're there!
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> >>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >OpenStack-dev mailing list
> >OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> >http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140515/8e249899/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 15
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 03:54:44 +0000
> From: Michael Dorman <mdorman at godaddy.com>
> To: "openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [barbican] any barbican devs at summit?
> Message-ID: <CF99B2BD.7D4F%mdorman at godaddy.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Would be interested in syncing up to hear about your experiences with
> this. Anybody at the summit this week that'd be willing to chat for a few
> minutes?
>
> Email works to reach out to me, or I'm on IRC (mdorman) sporadically this
> week.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140515/cee2c9fe/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 16
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 03:55:58 +0000
> From: Samuel Bercovici <SamuelB at Radware.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]LBaaS 1st Session
> etherpad
> Message-ID:
> <F36E8145F2571242A675F56CF60964560E6214E2 at ILMB1.corp.radware.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-lbaas-design-session
>
> Feel free to modify and update, please make sure you use your name so we
> will know who have added the modification.
>
> Regards,
> -Sam.
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140515/4ee356ae/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 17
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 04:01:12 +0000
> From: Douglas Mendizabal <douglas.mendizabal at RACKSPACE.COM>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] any barbican devs at summit?
> Message-ID: <CF99B379.142E4%douglas.mendizabal at rackspace.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> There?s quite a few Barbican devs here at the summit. We?ll be hanging out
> at the Barbican table in room B204 tomorrow if you want to drop in and
> chat.
> You can also ping us on #openstack-barbican on freenode.
>
> - Douglas Mendiz?bal
> IRC: redrobot
>
> From: Michael Dorman <mdorman at godaddy.com>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Date: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 at 8:54 PM
> To: "openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [barbican] any barbican devs at summit?
>
> Would be interested in syncing up to hear about your experiences with this.
> Anybody at the summit this week that?d be willing to chat for a few
> minutes?
>
> Email works to reach out to me, or I?m on IRC (mdorman) sporadically this
> week.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140515/68db2ab4/attachment-0001.html
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> Name: smime.p7s
> Type: application/pkcs7-signature
> Size: 5660 bytes
> Desc: not available
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140515/68db2ab4/attachment-0001.bin
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 18
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 04:06:13 +0000
> From: Michael Dorman <mdorman at godaddy.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] any barbican devs at summit?
> Message-ID: <CF99B560.7D80%mdorman at godaddy.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
>
> Fantastic. Will stop by at some point tomorrow. Thanks.
>
>
> From: Douglas Mendizabal <douglas.mendizabal at RACKSPACE.COM<mailto:
> douglas.mendizabal at RACKSPACE.COM>>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >>
> Date: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 at 10:01 PM
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [barbican] any barbican devs at summit?
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> There's quite a few Barbican devs here at the summit. We'll be hanging
> out at the Barbican table in room B204 tomorrow if you want to drop in and
> chat. You can also ping us on #openstack-barbican on freenode.
>
> - Douglas Mendiz?bal
> IRC: redrobot
>
> From: Michael Dorman <mdorman at godaddy.com<mailto:mdorman at godaddy.com>>
> Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" <
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> >>
> Date: Wednesday, May 14, 2014 at 8:54 PM
> To: "openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org<mailto:
> openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> <mailto:openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [barbican] any barbican devs at summit?
>
> Would be interested in syncing up to hear about your experiences with
> this. Anybody at the summit this week that'd be willing to chat for a few
> minutes?
>
> Email works to reach out to me, or I'm on IRC (mdorman) sporadically this
> week.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140515/14c93249/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 19
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 04:20:56 +0000
> From: Vijay Venkatachalam <Vijay.Venkatachalam at citrix.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]LBaaS 1st Session
> etherpad
> Message-ID:
> <26B082831A2B1A4783604AB89B9B2C080DF870E6 at SINPEX01CL03.citrite.net
> >
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi,
>
> I see the following statement in the doc.
>
> >>multiple loadbalancers may referenece the same listener
>
> Does this mean listeners are independent of loadbalancer?
>
> Thanks,
> Vijay V.
>
> From: Samuel Bercovici [mailto:SamuelB at Radware.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 9:26 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]LBaaS 1st Session etherpad
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-lbaas-design-session
>
> Feel free to modify and update, please make sure you use your name so we
> will know who have added the modification.
>
> Regards,
> -Sam.
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140515/f7f4bcf7/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 20
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 04:40:13 +0000
> From: Samuel Bercovici <SamuelB at Radware.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]LBaaS 1st Session
> etherpad
> Message-ID:
> <F36E8145F2571242A675F56CF60964560E621609 at ILMB1.corp.radware.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi,
>
> If a tenant wishes to expose his application (listener, pool(s), etc.) via
> multiple different virtual IP addresses you can do so.
>
> -Sam.
>
> From: Vijay Venkatachalam [mailto:Vijay.Venkatachalam at citrix.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 12:21 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]LBaaS 1st Session etherpad
>
> Hi,
>
> I see the following statement in the doc.
>
> >>multiple loadbalancers may referenece the same listener
>
> Does this mean listeners are independent of loadbalancer?
>
> Thanks,
> Vijay V.
>
> From: Samuel Bercovici [mailto:SamuelB at Radware.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 15, 2014 9:26 AM
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS]LBaaS 1st Session etherpad
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/juno-lbaas-design-session
>
> Feel free to modify and update, please make sure you use your name so we
> will know who have added the modification.
>
> Regards,
> -Sam.
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140515/e478b9a8/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 21
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 06:37:02 +0000
> From: "Xiaoding (B)" <xiaoding1 at huawei.com>
> To: "openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Nova][Pci] about nova resize with pci device
> Message-ID:
> <
> 89E0966AE9A1C3499DBCD33F337DA29B2782FE3A at szxema505-mbs.china.huawei.com>
>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Hi Stacks
> I test nova resize with pci device ,
>
>
> I select two flavor
> Flavor_1: cpu 1, mem 1G, pci 1,
> Flavor_2: cpu 2, mem 2G,
> Then boot instance_1 with Flavor_1 start at Host_A,
> Then I resize instance_1 to Flavor_2,
>
> I found the instance_1 start at Host_B, and flavor is Flavor_2, with pci
>
> The pci device is inherited from Flavor_1
>
> Is this reasonable?
>
>
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140515/96d3dbed/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 22
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 17:34:57 +0800
> From: xuanlangjian <xuanlangjian at gmail.com>
> To: openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat]How to get metadata when vm in a
> network without dhcp?
> Message-ID: <53748A41.7000600 at gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> Hi guys,
> I'm facing a problem when using heat template, my network has no
> dhcp. So after vm up, I will manually configure a ip for it. But in this
> case, vm can't get metadata scripts, and also can't do any configure work.
> So I'm wondering is there a way to get metadata scripts to work
> without IP, or configure IP automatically before getting metadata scripts?
>
> Best Regards,
> Ethan Lynn
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 23
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 11:20:24 +0100
> From: David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick at kent.ac.uk>
> To: Adam Young <ayoung at redhat.com>, "Tiwari, Arvind"
> <arvind.tiwari at hp.com>, "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not
> for
> usage questions)" <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [keystone] Service scoped role definition
> Message-ID: <537494E8.1010700 at kent.ac.uk>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>
> In preparation for and input to today's design summit session on
> Authorisation at 11.50am, I thought it might be beneficial to remind
> folks of the proposed design that was circulated by me at the end of the
> long discussion on the format of a scoped role, that was held at the end
> of last year on this list. Here it is:
>
> {
> "role": {
> "id": "76e72a",
> "domain_id" = "--id--", (optional, if present, role is named by
> specific domain)
> "project_id" = "--id--", (optional, if present, role is named
> by project)
> "service_id" = "--id--", (optional, if present, role is named
> by service)
> "name": "---role_name---", (must be unique when combined with
> domain, project and service ids)
> "scope": {"id": "---id---", (resource_id)
> "type": "service | file | domain etc.",
> "endpoint":"---endpoint---"
> }
> }
> }
>
> regards
>
> David
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 24
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 14:31:54 +0400
> From: Eugene Nikanorov <enikanorov at mirantis.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Updated Object Model?
> Message-ID:
> <CAJfiwOQOwLGJKrV02GXzH=BPRjzbM1Yd3RPUJV+RBijA=
> gMtkQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Hi Craig,
>
> Implementation-specific options are not exposed through the API, or
> otherwise it would be inconsistent, given that we are moving to a
> flavor-based approach of specifying service requirements where
> implementation is completely hidden from the user.
>
> Thanks,
> Eugene.
>
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:24 AM, IWAMOTO Toshihiro <iwamoto at valinux.co.jp
> >wrote:
>
> > At Wed, 14 May 2014 10:18:29 -0700,
> > Stephen Balukoff wrote:
> > >
> > > [1 <multipart/alternative (7bit)>]
> > > [1.1 <text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)>]
> > > Hi Craig,
> > >
> > > I'm attaching the latest object model diagram as discussed with the RAX
> > > team last night, Samuel and Eugene. Note that we don't necessarily have
> > > HP's blessing on this model yet, nor do we have Neutron core developer
> > buy
> > > in. But in any case, here it is.
> >
> > Sorry for jumping into a meta-argument,
> > but what the LBaaS community needs to do first is to figure out how to
> > make the neutron community agree on a LBaaS proposal.
> > On the other hand, the neutron community (or the core?) needs to make
> > it clear that what criteria or process is required to approve some
> > LBaaS idea (obj. model, API, whatsoever).
> >
> >
> > I'm sorry to say (again) that not much people have energy to follow
> > and check out small differences in those large pictures of LBaaS
> > object models.
> >
> > --
> > IWAMOTO Toshihiro
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140515/cb58e406/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 25
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 19:25:53 +0800
> From: Qiming Teng <tengqim at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat]How to get metadata when vm in a
> network without dhcp?
> Message-ID: <20140515112552.GA28858 at localhost>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Please post usage question to openstack at lists.openstack.org, not this
> development mailing list.
> As for your case, you may want to check config_drive, which is supported
> both at nova cli and heat templates.
>
> Regards,
> Qimng
>
> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 05:34:57PM +0800, xuanlangjian wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > I'm facing a problem when using heat template, my network has no
> > dhcp. So after vm up, I will manually configure a ip for it. But in
> > this case, vm can't get metadata scripts, and also can't do any
> > configure work.
> > So I'm wondering is there a way to get metadata scripts to work
> > without IP, or configure IP automatically before getting metadata
> > scripts?
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Ethan Lynn
> >
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 26
> Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 19:49:46 +0800
> From: Zang MingJie <zealot0630 at gmail.com>
> To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
> <openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: [openstack-dev] [Neutron] Monitoring agent
> Message-ID:
> <
> CAOrge3p7yR62JD3_AjtnEHaak0jYoGXEAB6goTXWJRw906+uEg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>
> Hi All:
>
> I want to know is there any way to continuously monitor ports
> connectivity, and report dead port via snmp trap or whatever.
>
> Currently I got neutron-debug utility which can help me checking port
> status by hand, but it would be better to have an agent to do the job
> automatically, and also collect port statistics for analysis.
>
> Look for suggestion
>
> Regards
>
> --
> Zang MingJie
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
> End of OpenStack-dev Digest, Vol 25, Issue 39
> *********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140515/720f476a/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list