[openstack-dev] [Neutron][LBaaS] Multiple VIPs per loadbalancer

Carlos Garza carlos.garza at rackspace.com
Sat May 10 19:44:51 UTC 2014


On May 10, 2014, at 1:52 AM, Eugene Nikanorov <enikanorov at mirantis.com>
 wrote:

> Hi Carlos,
> I think you had a chance to hear this argument yourself (from several different core members: Mark McClain, Salvatore Orlando, Kyle Mestery) on those meetings we had in past 2 months.
> I was advocating 'loadbalancer' (in it's extended version) once too, receiving negative opinions as well.
> In general this approach puts too much of control of a backend to user's hands and this goes in opposite direction than neutron project.
> 
> If it's just about the name of the root object - VIP suits this role too, so I'm fine with that. I also find VIP/Listeners model a bit more clearer per definitions in our glossary.
> 
> Thanks,
> Eugene.

    I was in those meetings Eugene and was read the irc logs of the two I missed and was of the impression they were open to discussion.I'll defer this topic until the summit.
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev




More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list