Open Stack

I agree that everyone's thoughts should be in it. I don't see why a
representative vote does not allow for that. Sam put a text box on each
use case to capture extra thoughts.

I would hope that no organization would be so confused as to have widely
varying viewpoints on *what their customers want*, since that is the
supposed purpose of all of this, right? We're supposed to be deciding
which use-cases matter *to our customers*, so there should be no real
variance for what I would vote versus what my teammates would vote, since
we have the same customersŠ


Also, if we are using this as a type of voting mechanism then interests of
large/vocal organizations drown out smaller organizations. If this is
being used as a voting mechanism then how do you suggest we weight votes
for smaller companies so that we do not alienate them from further
voting/discussions?

Cheers,
--Jorge




On 5/6/14 1:52 PM, "Jay Pipes" <jaypipes at gmail.com> wrote:

>On 05/06/2014 02:42 PM, Jorge Miramontes wrote:
>> Sam,
>>
>> I'm assuming you want one person from each company to answer correct?
>> I'm pretty sure people in each organization will vote the sameŠat least
>> I'd hope!
>
>I'd hope not! :)
>
>Even within the same organization or company, we all have different
>ideas on use cases, the appropriateness of certain things "in the
>cloud", and the role of a load balancer service in the general mix of
>things.
>
>I certainly would hope that lots of Mirantis engineers other than myself
>fill out the use case survey and offer their own insights.
>
>Best,
>-jay
>
>_______________________________________________
>OpenStack-dev mailing list
>OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev