[openstack-dev] [Cinder] Confusion about the respective use cases for volume's admin_metadata, metadata and glance_image_metadata

Duncan Thomas duncan.thomas at gmail.com
Tue May 6 17:00:20 UTC 2014

Previous message: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Confusion about the respective use cases for volume's admin_metadata, metadata and glance_image_metadata
Next message: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Confusion about the respective use cases for volume's admin_metadata, metadata and glance_image_metadata
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On 6 May 2014 14:46, Trump.Zhang <zhangleiqiang at gmail.com> wrote:

> Did you mean using volume metadata was not the right way for the first
> situation I mentioned in ealier mail?

Correct. Volume metadata is entirely for the tenant to use, it is not
interpreted by cinder or nova as meaning anything.

Previous message: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Confusion about the respective use cases for volume's admin_metadata, metadata and glance_image_metadata
Next message: [openstack-dev] [Cinder] Confusion about the respective use cases for volume's admin_metadata, metadata and glance_image_metadata
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list