Open Stack

Hi @all,
    I like the idea of alternate meetings, so everybody get a chance to
make it at decent hours (I can't complaint about that).
   About the suggested time(any time will have it upsides and downs)
0700UTC, could be a good option (Sorry for the people on the East Coast,
but I think our 'population' there is minimal), although something
earlier is ok to me.

See you all in Atlanta!

Ghe Rivero

On 05/06/2014 02:58 AM, James Polley wrote:
> Actually, it's probably best that we don't do the first meeting at a
> US-unfriendly timezone in a week that the summit is on in Atlanta.
>
> Maybe the week after summit, or even the second week after summit?
>
>
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:49 AM, James Polley <jp at jamezpolley.com
> <mailto:jp at jamezpolley.com>> wrote:
>
>     To revive this thread... I'd really like to see us trying out
>     alternate meeting times for a while.
>
>
>     > Tuesdays at 14:00 UTC on #openstack-meeting-alt is available.
>
>     Looking at the iCal feed it looks like it's actually taken by
>     Solum. But in any case:
>
>     On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Robert
>     Collins <robertc at robertcollins.net
>     <mailto:robertc at robertcollins.net>> wrote:
>
>         I think we need a timezone to cover the current impossible
>         regions:
>
>          - Australia
>          - China / Japan
>          - India
>
>
>     1400UTC is midnight Sydney time, 11pm Tokyo, 7:30pm New Delhi.
>     Personally that's worse for me than 1700UTC.
>
>     I'd prefer to move it significantly later than 1900UTC, especially
>     if we want a time that's civilized (or at least, achievable) in
>     India. 0700UTC seems ideal to me - 5pm Sydney, 4pm Tokyo, 12:30pm
>     New Delhi. It's not  friendly to the US (midnight SF, 3am NYC).
>     but it should work well for Europe - 8am London, and it gets later
>     in the day as you go east.
>
>     What would we need to do to try this time out next week?
>
>
>     On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 8:03 PM, <jang at ioctl.org
>     <mailto:jang at ioctl.org>> wrote:
>
>         On Wed, 19 Mar 2014, Sullivan, Jon Paul wrote:
>
>         > > From: James Slagle [mailto:james.slagle at gmail.com
>         <mailto:james.slagle at gmail.com>]
>         > > Sent: 18 March 2014 19:58
>         > > Subject: [openstack-dev] [TripleO] Alternating meeting
>         time for more TZ
>         > > friendliness
>         > >
>         > > Our current meeting time is Tuesdays at 19:00 UTC.  I
>         think this works
>         > > ok for most folks in and around North America.
>         > >
>         > > It was proposed during today's meeting to see if there is
>         interest is an
>         > > alternating meeting time every other week so that we can
>         be a bit more
>         > > friendly to those folks that currently can't attend.
>         > > If that interests you, speak up :).
>         >
>         > Speaking up! :D
>
>         Also interested.
>
>         > Tuesdays at 14:00 UTC on #openstack-meeting-alt is available.
>
>         Relatively speaking, that's actually sociable.
>
>         --
>         Update your address books: jang at ioctl.org
>         <mailto:jang at ioctl.org>  http://ioctl.org/jan/
>         perl -e 's?ck?t??print:perl==pants if $_="Just Another Perl
>         Hacker\n"'
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         OpenStack-dev mailing list
>         OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>         <mailto:OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org>
>         http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140506/62aa89a9/attachment.html>