Open Stack

Sean, please see my comment in bug regarding 0.7. Unfortunately I have
nothing to suggest here. If distributive contains only 0.7 we cannot work
with HBase through happybase. And I don't see any solutions.
But anyway if you change requirements for happybase (I guess we need to get
0.7 back, no?) could you please remove 0.4? 0.4 doesn't allow to work with
pools but we need to.

Thanks,
Nadya


On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 9:07 PM, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net> wrote:

> On 03/28/2014 12:50 PM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > Thierry Carrez wrote:
> >> Julien Danjou wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Mar 27 2014, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> -happybase>=0.4,<=0.6
> >>>> +happybase>=0.8
> >>>
> >>> Good for me, and Ceilometer is the only one using happybase as far as I
> >>> know so that shouldn't be a problem.
> >>
> >> OK so I would be fine with "happybase>=0.4,!=0.6,!=0.7" as it allows 0.8
> >> to be run without adversely impacting downstreams who don't have it
> >> available.
> >
> > Actually that should be "happybase>=0.4,!=0.7" since 0.6 was allowed
> before.
>
> The review has comments about 0.7 being the version in Debian and Ubuntu
> right now https://review.openstack.org/#/c/82438/.
>
> Which is problematic, as that's a version that's specifically being
> called out by the ceilometer team as not useable. Do we know why, and if
> it can be worked around?
>
>         -Sean
>
> --
> Sean Dague
> Samsung Research America
> sean at dague.net / sean.dague at samsung.com
> http://dague.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140328/dd65dcab/attachment.html>