Open Stack

Hi all,

As promise, the blog post [1] about running devstack into containers.

[1]
http://dev.cloudwatt.com/en/blog/running-devstack-into-linux-containers.html

Regards,
Edouard.
Le 21 mars 2014 14:12, "Kyle Mestery" <mestery at noironetworks.com> a écrit :

> Getting this type of functional testing into the gate would be pretty
> phenomenal.
> Thanks for your continued efforts here Mathieu! If there is anything I can
> do to
> help here, let me know. One other concern here is that the infra team may
> have
> issues running a version of OVS which isn't packaged into Ubuntu/CentOS.
> Keep
> that in mind as well.
>
> Edourard, I look forward to your blog, please share it here once you've
> written it!
>
> Thanks,
> Kyle
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:15 AM, Édouard Thuleau <thuleau at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Thanks Mathieu for your support and work onto CI to enable multi-node.
>>
>> I wrote a blog post about how to run devstack development environment
>> with LXC.
>> I hope it will be publish next week.
>>
>> Just add a pointer about OVS support network namespaces since 2 years ago
>> now [1].
>>
>> [1]
>> http://git.openvswitch.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=openvswitch;a=commitdiff;h=2a4999f3f33467f4fa22ed6e5b06350615fb2dac
>>
>> Regards,
>> Édouard.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 11:31 AM, Mathieu Rohon <mathieu.rohon at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi edouard,
>>>
>>> thanks for the information. I would love to see your patch getting
>>> merged to have l2-population MD fully functional with an OVS based
>>> deployment. Moreover, this patch has a minimal impact on neutron,
>>> since the code is used only if l2-population MD is used in the ML2
>>> plugin.
>>>
>>> markmcclain was concerned that no functional testing is done, but
>>> L2-population MD needs mutlinode deployment to be tested. A deployment
>>> based on a single VM won't create overlay tunnels, which is a
>>> mandatory technology to have l2-population activated.
>>> The Opensatck-CI is not able, for the moment, to run job based on
>>> multi-node deployment. We proposed an evolution of devstack to have a
>>> multinode deployment based on a single VM which launch compute nodes
>>> in LXC containers [1], but this evolution has been refused by
>>> Opensatck-CI since there is other ways to run multinode setup with
>>> devstack, and LXC container is not compatible with iscsi and probably
>>> ovs [2][3].
>>>
>>> One way to have functional test for this feature would be to deploy
>>> 3rd party testing environment, but it would be a pity to have to
>>> maintain a 3rd party to test some functionalities which are not based
>>> on 3rd party equipments. So we are currently learning about the
>>> Openstack-CI tools to propose some evolutions to have mutinode setup
>>> inside the gate [4]. There are a lot of way to implement it
>>> (node-pools evolution, usage of tripleO, of Heat [5]), and we don't
>>> know which one would be the easiest, and so the one we have to work on
>>> to have the multinode feature available ASAP.
>>>
>>> This feature looks very important for Neutron, at least to test
>>> overlay tunneling. I thinks it's very important for nova too, to test
>>> live-migration.
>>>
>>>
>>> [1]https://blueprints.launchpad.net/devstack/+spec/lxc-computes
>>> [2]https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lxc/+bug/1226855
>>> [3]
>>> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/infra/2014/infra.2014-02-18-19.01.log.html
>>> [4]
>>> https://www.mail-archive.com/openstack-infra@lists.openstack.org/msg00968.html
>>> [5]
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-infra/2013-July/000128.html
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 10:08 AM, Édouard Thuleau <thuleau at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > Just to inform you that the new OVS release 2.1.0 was done yesterday
>>> [1].
>>> > This release contains new features and significant performance
>>> improvements
>>> > [2].
>>> >
>>> > And in that new features, one [3] was use to add local ARP responder
>>> with
>>> > OVS agent and the plugin ML2 with the MD l2-pop [4]. Perhaps, it's
>>> time to
>>> > reconsider that review?
>>> >
>>> > [1] https://www.mail-archive.com/discuss@openvswitch.org/msg09251.html
>>> > [2] http://openvswitch.org/releases/NEWS-2.1.0
>>> > [3]
>>> >
>>> http://git.openvswitch.org/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=openvswitch;a=commitdiff;h=f6c8a6b163af343c66aea54953553d84863835f7
>>> > [4] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/49227/
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> > Édouard.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>> >
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140325/11b53d2d/attachment.html>