On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 2:28 PM, Sean Dague <sean at dague.net> wrote: > On 03/24/2014 02:20 PM, Doug Hellmann wrote: > > > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 5:33 AM, Thierry Carrez <thierry at openstack.org > > <mailto:thierry at openstack.org>> wrote: > > > > Joe Gordon wrote: > > > There are still two outstanding trove dependencies that are > currently > > > used in trove but not in global requirements. It would be nice to > get > > > this sorted out before the freeze so we can > > > turn https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80690/ on. > > > > > > mockito https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80850/ > > > > This one was abandoned. Trove team is "looking to move away from > mockito > > to mock. Timeline is in the next 4-5 days". > > > > > > I was one of several people who objected to that. I would be happy to > > change my -1 to a +2 if the Trove team needs more time to change. > > Perhaps as a J1 goal? > > The Trove team said last week they could probably land the remove in > trove this week for mockito (it was on their roadmap anyway). So unless > they feel that's not doable, I think we're good. > Sounds good. Doug > > -Sean > > -- > Sean Dague > Samsung Research America > sean at dague.net / sean.dague at samsung.com > http://dague.net > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140324/dab47cf3/attachment.html>