[openstack-dev] [nova][baremetal] Status of nova baremetal and ironic
zhongyue.nah at intel.com
Tue Mar 18 07:22:29 UTC 2014
If I were to implement a new BM driver then should I propose a BP to Ironic
rather than Nova? We are currently writing a driver internally using
nova-baremetal. My understanding is that nova-baremetal will only merge
critical bug fixes and new features will merge to Ironic, correct? Thanks.
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 1:37 AM, Chris K <nobodycam at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Taurus,
> You are correct Ironic is under rapid development right now, there are
> several patches in flight right now critical to Ironic. There have been
> successful tests using Ironic to boot both vm's and real hardware, but at
> this time I would say we are just about out of alpha and entering bata
> stages. Ironic's Goal is to graduate from incubation in the Icehouse cycle,
> and start integration in the "J" cycle. We are working on a migration path
> from Nova-bm to Ironic as part of this graduation. With out knowing what
> environment you are using Nova-bm it is very difficult to say when you
> should look at switching, but off the top of my head I would say: "Look at
> evaluating after the Icehouse release." I would include with that "Check
> back often, things are changing quickly."
> Chris Krelle
> On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 1:58 AM, Taurus Cheung <
> Taurus.Cheung at harmonicinc.com> wrote:
>> I am working on deploying images to bare-metal machines using nova
>> bare-metal. So far working well.
>> I know Ironic is under rapid development. Could I know the current status
>> of Ironic and the suitable time to shift from nova baremetal to Ironic?
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
880 Zixing Road, Zizhu Science Park, Minhang District, 200241, Shanghai,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the OpenStack-dev