[openstack-dev] OpenStack vs. SQLA 0.9
rpodolyaka at mirantis.com
Fri Mar 14 05:45:42 UTC 2014
I think it's actually not that hard to fix the errors we have when
using SQLAlchemy 0.9.x releases.
I uploaded two changes two Nova to fix unit tests:
- https://review.openstack.org/#/c/80431/ (this one should also fix
the Tempest test run error)
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 7:41 PM, Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote:
> On 03/14/2014 02:06 AM, Sean Dague wrote:
>> On 03/13/2014 12:31 PM, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>>> On 03/12/2014 07:07 PM, Sean Dague wrote:
>>>> Because of where we are in the freeze, I think this should wait until
>>>> Juno opens to fix. Icehouse will only be compatible with SQLA 0.8, which
>>>> I think is fine. I expect the rest of the issues can be addressed during
>>>> Juno 1.
>>> No, it's not fine for me. I'd like things to be fixed so we can move
>>> forward. Debian Sid has SQLA 0.9, and Jessie (the next Debian stable)
>>> will be released SQLA 0.9 and with Icehouse, not Juno.
>> We're past freeze, and this requires deep changes in Nova DB to work. So
>> it's not going to happen. Nova provably does not work with SQLA 0.9, as
>> seen in Tempest tests.
> I'd be nice if we considered more the fact that OpenStack, at some
> point, gets deployed on top of distributions... :/
> Anyway, if we can't do it because of the freeze, then I will have to
> carry the patch in the Debian package. Never the less, someone will have
> to work and fix it. If you know how to help, it'd be very nice if you
> proposed a patch, even if we don't accept it before Juno opens.
> Thomas Goirand (zigo)
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
More information about the OpenStack-dev