[openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember?
Mike Spreitzer
mspreitz at us.ibm.com
Thu Mar 13 18:22:48 UTC 2014
Therve told me he actually tested this and it works. Now if I could only
configure DevStack to install a working Neutron...
Regards,
Mike
From: "Fox, Kevin M" <Kevin.Fox at pnnl.gov>
To: Chris Armstrong <chris.armstrong at RACKSPACE.COM>, "OpenStack
Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)"
<openstack-dev at lists.openstack.org>,
Date: 03/13/2014 02:19 PM
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron]
OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and OS::Neutron::PoolMember?
Hi Chris,
That's great to hear. I'm looking forward to installing icehouse and
testing that out. :)
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Chris Armstrong [chris.armstrong at RACKSPACE.COM]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 1:29 PM
To: Fox, Kevin M; OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage
questions)
Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup
and OS::Neutron::PoolMember?
Hi Kevin,
The design of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup should not require explicit
support for load balancers. The design is meant to allow you to create a
resource that wraps up both a OS::Heat::Server and a PoolMember in a
template and use it via a Stack resource.
(Note that Mike was talking about the new OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup
resource, not AWS::AutoScaling::AutoScalingGroup).
So, while I haven’t tested this case with PoolMember specifically, and
there may still be bugs, no more feature implementation should be
necessary (I hope).
--
Christopher Armstrong
IRC: radix
On March 12, 2014 at 1:52:53 PM, Fox, Kevin M (kevin.fox at pnnl.gov) wrote:
I submitted a blueprint a while back that I think is relevant:
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/heat/+spec/elasticloadbalancing-lbaas
Currently heat autoscaling doesn't interact with Neutron lbaas and the
configurable bits aren't configurable enough to allow it without code
changes as far as I can tell.
I think its only a few days of work, but the OpenStack CLA is preventing
me from contributing. :/
Thanks,
Kevin
From: Mike Spreitzer [mspreitz at us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2014 11:34 AM
To: OpenStack Development Mailing List
Subject: [openstack-dev] [heat][neutron] OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup and
OS::Neutron::PoolMember?
Has anybody exercised the case of OS::Heat::AutoScalingGroup scaling a
nested stack that includes a OS::Neutron::PoolMember? Should I expect
this to work?
Thanks,
Mike
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
_______________________________________________
OpenStack-dev mailing list
OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140313/88af532f/attachment.html>
More information about the OpenStack-dev
mailing list