[openstack-dev] OpenStack vs. SQLA 0.9

Sean Dague sean at dague.net
Thu Mar 13 17:29:54 UTC 2014


On 03/13/2014 12:42 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
>> Because of where we are in the freeze, I think this should wait
>> until Juno opens to fix. Icehouse will only be compatible with
>> SQLA 0.8, which I think is fine. I expect the rest of the issues
>> can be addressed during Juno 1.
> 
> Agreed. I think we have some other things to check before we make this
> move, like how we currently check to see if something is loaded in a
> SQLA object. ISTR it changed between 0.8 and 0.9 and so likely tests
> would not fail, but we'd lazy load a bunch of stuff that we didn't
> intend to.
> 
> Even without that, I think it's really way too late to make such a switch.
> 
> --Dan

Yeh, the initial look at Tempest failures wasn't terrible once I fixed a
ceilometer issue. However something is definitely different on delete
semantics, enough to make us fail a bunch of Nova Tempest tests.

That seems dangerous to address during freeze.

I consider this something which should be dealt with in Juno 1 though,
as I'm very interested in whether the new optimizer in sqla 0.9 helps us
on performance.

	-Sean

-- 
Sean Dague
Samsung Research America
sean at dague.net / sean.dague at samsung.com
http://dague.net

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 482 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140313/c9984219/attachment.pgp>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list