Open Stack

On 3/12/2014 6:32 PM, Dan Smith wrote:
>> I'm confused as to why we arrived at the decision to revert the commits
>> since Jay's patch was accepted. I'd like some details about this
>> decision, and what new steps we need to take to get this back in for Juno.
>
> Jay's fix resolved the immediate problem that was reported by the user.
> However, after realizing why the bug manifested itself and why it didn't
> occur during our testing, all of the core members involved recommended a
> revert as the least-risky course of action at this point. If it took
> almost no time for that change to break a user that wasn't even using
> the feature, we're fearful about what may crop up later.
>
> We talked with the patch author (zhiyan) in IRC for a while after making
> the decision to revert about what the path forward for Juno is. The
> tl;dr as I recall is:
>
>   1. Full Glance v2 API support merged
>   2. Tests in tempest and nova that exercise Glance v2, and the new
>      feature
>   3. Push the feature patches back in
>
> --Dan
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>

Those are essentially the steps as I remember them too.  Sean changed 
the dependencies in the blueprints so the nova glance v2 blueprint is 
the root dependency, then multiple images and then the other download 
handler blueprints at the top.  I haven't checked but the blueprints 
should be marked as not complete (not sure what that would be now) and 
marked for next, the v2 glance root blueprint should be marked as high 
priority too so we get the proper focus when Juno opens up.

-- 

Thanks,

Matt Riedemann