[openstack-dev] [Neutron][L3] FFE request: L3 HA VRRP

Nir Yechiel nyechiel at redhat.com
Sun Mar 9 12:22:07 UTC 2014


+1

I see it as one of the main current gaps and I believe that this is something that can promote Neutron as stable and production ready. 
Based on Édouard's comment below, having this enabled in Icehouse as experimental makes a lot of sense to me.  

----- Original Message -----
> +1
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> > +1
> > 
> > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 2:42 AM, Édouard Thuleau <thuleau at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1
> > > I though it must merge as experimental for IceHouse, to let the community
> > > tries it and stabilizes it during the Juno release. And for the Juno
> > > release, we will be able to announce it as stable.
> > >
> > > Furthermore, the next work, will be to distribute the l3 stuff at the
> > > edge
> > > (compute) (called DVR) but this VRRP work will still needed for that [1].
> > > So if we merge L3 HA VRRP as experimental in I to be stable in J, will
> > > could
> > > also propose an experimental DVR solution for J and a stable for K.
> > >
> > > [1]
> > > https://docs.google.com/drawings/d/1GGwbLa72n8c2T3SBApKK7uJ6WLTSRa7erTI_3QNj5Bg/edit
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Édouard.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:27 PM, Sylvain Afchain
> > > <sylvain.afchain at enovance.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> I would like to request a FFE for the following patches of the L3 HA
> > >> VRRP
> > >> BP :
> > >>
> > >> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/neutron/+spec/l3-high-availability
> > >>
> > >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/64553/
> > >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/66347/
> > >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/68142/
> > >> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/70700/
> > >>
> > >> These should be low risk since HA is not enabled by default.
> > >> The server side code has been developed as an extension which minimizes
> > >> risk.
> > >> The agent side code introduces a bit more changes but only to filter
> > >> whether to apply the
> > >> new HA behavior.
> > >>
> > >> I think it's a good idea to have this feature in Icehouse, perhaps even
> > >> marked as experimental,
> > >> especially considering the demand for HA in real world deployments.
> > >>
> > >> Here is a doc to test it :
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1P2OnlKAGMeSZTbGENNAKOse6B2TRXJ8keUMVvtUCUSM/edit#heading=h.xjip6aepu7ug
> > >>
> > >> -Sylvain
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > >> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > >
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > OpenStack-dev mailing list
> > OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
> 



More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list