Open Stack

Shouldn't be a problem, I'll sort through the items but I was looking
earlier and didn't see anything concerning.  All of them have been in
process for some time so I think an exception is fair.
On Mar 6, 2014 10:40 AM, "Subramanian" <subramanian.neelakantan at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
> https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/vmdk-storage-policy-volume-type
> .
>
> This is a blueprint that I am working on since Dec 2013 and as far I
> remember it was targetted to icehouse-3. Just today I noticed that it was
> moved to "future", so should have feel through the cracks for core
> reviewers.Is there a chance that this can still make it into icehouse?
> Given that the change is fairly isolated in vmdk driver, and that the code
> across 4 patches [1] that implement this blueprint has been fairly
> reviewed, can I request for an FFE for this one?
>
> Thanks,
> Subbu
>
> [1]
> https://review.openstack.org/#/q/status:open+project:openstack/cinder+branch:master+topic:bp/vmdk-storage-policy-volume-type,n,z
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140308/15812933/attachment.html>