Open Stack

Good work on the documentation, it's something that will really help
new neutron developers.



On 03/07/2014 07:44 PM, Akihiro Motoki wrote:
> Hi Carl,
>
> I really appreciate you for writing this up!
> I have no hurdle to remove my -1 for the review.
> I just thought it is an item easy to fix.
>
> It is a great start line towards useufl developer documentation.
>
> Thanks,
> Akihiro
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Collins, Sean
> <Sean_Collins2 at cable.comcast.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know everyone is very busy working on the I-3 release, but I wanted
>> solicit feedback on my developer documentation review.
>>
>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/72428/
>>
>> Currently, we have a couple +1's and a +2 from Nachi - Akihirio Motoki
>> and Henry Gessau brought up valid points about the TESTING file, but I
>> felt that they can be addressed in other patchsets - since I don't feel
>> confident in making the changes that they suggested, and some of the
>> comments refer to issues that exist in the
>>
>> In addition, we're almost to the goal line - I'd rather get some docs
>> merged and update in another patchset, rather than update this review
>> with another patchset, that clears out all the +2's and +1's and then
>> wait for everyone to circle back and re-approve.
>>
>> I understand this is a unusual request and I am asking for special
>> treatment, but Neutron is severely lacking in documentation for new
>> developers and I think this patch moves us closer to fixing it.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> --
>> Sean M. Collins
>> _______________________________________________
>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> OpenStack-dev mailing list
> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
>