[openstack-dev] [Nova] FFE Request: Ephemeral RBD image support
josh.durgin at inktank.com
Fri Mar 7 03:28:49 UTC 2014
On 03/06/2014 05:37 PM, Andrew Woodward wrote:
> I'd love to see this too, however I'm not seasoned enough to even know
> much about how to start implementing that. I'd love some direction,
> and maybe some support after you guys are done with the pending
We're working on setting up CI with Ceph starting with Cinder.
Jay Pipes' recent blog posts explaining this process are great:
> As others have illustrated here, the current RBD support in nova is
> effectively useless and I'd love to see that second sponsor so us Ceph
> users don't have to use hand patched nova for another release.
> On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 3:30 PM, Matt Riedemann
> <mriedem at linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>> On 3/6/2014 2:20 AM, Andrew Woodward wrote:
>>> I'd Like to request A FFE for the remaining patches in the Ephemeral
>>> RBD image support chain
>>> are still open after their dependency
>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/33409/ was merged.
>>> These should be low risk as:
>>> 1. We have been testing with this code in place.
>>> 2. It's nearly all contained within the RBD driver.
>>> This is needed as it implements an essential functionality that has
>>> been missing in the RBD driver and this will become the second release
>>> it's been attempted to be merged into.
>>> Ceph Community
>>> OpenStack-dev mailing list
>>> OpenStack-dev at lists.openstack.org
>> What would be awesome in Juno is some CI around RBD/Ceph. I'd feel a lot
>> more comfortable with this code if we had CI running Tempest against that
>> type of configuration, just like how we are now requiring 3rd party CI for
>> virt drivers.
>> I realize this is tangential but it would make moving these blueprints
>> through faster so you're not working on it over multiple releases.
>> Having said that, I'm not signing up for sponsoring this, sorry. :)
>> Matt Riedemann
More information about the OpenStack-dev