[openstack-dev] Climate Incubation Application

Sean Dague sean at dague.net
Mon Mar 3 15:04:58 UTC 2014


On 03/02/2014 02:32 PM, Dina Belova wrote:
> Hello, folks!
> 
> I'd like to request Climate project review for incubation. Here is
> official incubation application:
> 
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Climate/Incubation
> 
> Additionally due to the project scope and the roadmap, we don't see any
> currently existing OpenStack program that fits Climate. So we've
> prepared new program request too:
> 
> https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Climate/Program
> 
> TL;DR
> 
> Our team is working on providing OpenStack with resource reservation
> opportunity in time-based manner, including close integration with all
> other OS projects.
> 
> As Climate initiative is targeting to provide not only compute resources
> revervation, but also volumes, network resources, storage nodes
> reservation opportunity, we consider it is not about being a part of
> some existing OpenStack program.
> 
> This initiative needs to become a part of completely new Resource
> Reservation Program, that aims to implement time-based cloud resource
> management.

At a high level this feels like this should be part of scheduling.
Scheduling might include resources you want right now, but it could
include resources you want in the future. It also makes sense for
scheduling to include deadlines, so that resources are reclaimed when
they expire. Especially given quota implications of asking for resources
now vs. resources that a user has reserved in the future. What happens
when a user has used all their quota in the present, and a future
reservation comes up for access?

Scheduling today is under compute. The proposal to pull Gantt out still
leaves it in the compute program. So I would naturally assume this
should live under compute. I could understand that if this & Gantt
emerged together and wanted to create a "Resource Allocation" program,
that might make sense. But I think that's way down the road.

However, that's just a quick look at this. I think it will be an
interesting discussion in how this effort moves forward.

	-Sean

-- 
Sean Dague
Samsung Research America
sean at dague.net / sean.dague at samsung.com
http://dague.net

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 482 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/attachments/20140303/083e65b1/attachment.pgp>


More information about the OpenStack-dev mailing list